MyFox
 

thorn's Blog

by thorn from Floriduh

Last Post 214 days, 4 hours Ago


Bush: "We Should Have Bombed" Aushwitz To Stop The Killing - Ignores Fact His Grandfather Profited From Nazi Slave Labor
By Jon Ponder
January 11, 2008

George Bush toured the Holocaust memorial in Israel yesterday, and through tears, came up with a telling formulation about what his predecessor, Pres. Franklin Roosevelt, should have done to stop the horror at the German concentration camps:

President George W. Bush had tears in his eyes during an hour-long tour of Israel’s Holocaust memorial and told Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice that the US should have bombed Auschwitz to halt the killing, the memorial’s chairman said.

Bush emerged from a tour of the Yad Vashem memorial today calling it a “sobering reminder” that evil must be resisted, and praising victims for not losing their faith.

Wearing a yarmulke, Bush placed a red-white-and-blue wreath on a stone slab that covers ashes of Holocaust victims taken from six extermination camps. He also lit a torch memorializing the victims.

Bush was visibly moved as he toured the site, said Yad Vashem’s chairman, Avner Shalev.

“Twice, I saw tears well up in his eyes,” Shalev said.

At one point, Bush viewed aerial photos of the Auschwitz camp taken during the war by US forces and called Rice over to discuss why the American government had decided against bombing the site, Shalev said.

“We should have bombed it,” Bush said, according to Shalev.

If the only tool you have is a hammer, the saying goes, then every solution will look like a nail. Thus, in Bush’s primitive brain, the best way to have stopped the horror at the camps would have been to bomb the hell out of them.

Mainly, though, it’s hard to get past the cognitive dissonance of reading an honest, human utterance from Bush’s mouth that was not crafted by the White House political shop and focus-grouped in Paramus to ensure ambiguity.

It also reminds us of the unique kid-glove treatment George W. Bush receives from the media. It is impossible to imagine any other politician whose grandfather had profited from Nazi slave labor who could tour a Holocaust memorial with the media in tow and not be hounded for a comment on his grandfather’s role in the horror.

First the history: Before the war, the Hitler regime’s mistreatment of Jews — particularly the government’s policy of ethnically cleansing Jews out of mixed neighborhoods into Jewish-only ghettos — may have seemed less outrageous in the racially segregated America of the late 1930s than it does today. The same goes for conscripting Jews into forced labor. In 1942, just four years after the Germans began sending Jews to labor camps, the US government sent thousands of Japanese-American citizens into camps in the west, for example.

While the American public had no idea about the mass killings until after the camps were liberated in 1945, the debate continues even now among historians about the extent of FDR’s knowledge of the genocide while it was underway. He died in April that year, just four months after Auschwitz was captured.

In the scheme of things, however, the martyrdom of the Jews, Gypsies and gay people in the camps has had a positive effect on European and German society, for the entirety of civilization, because the fact that the camps were intact at the war’s end provided irrefutable evidence of the genocide.

For example, after the war, the Allied commanders forced rank and file German citizens, who claimed not to have known that their government was gassing 6 million people literally under their noses, to tour the camps to see with their own eyes the horror wrought in their names (and with their tax dollars) — and to witness the inevitable result of the bigotry ingrained in their culture. Forcing the Germans to accept the horrible truth about Nazism contributed to bringing an end to Germany’s decades of aggression against its neighbors, once and for all.

What has been all but forgotten, however, is the role of Prescott Bush, George W. Bush’s grandfather, who was in business with the Nazis even after the US entered the war in late 1941:

George Bush’s grandfather, the late US senator Prescott Bush, was a director and shareholder of companies that profited from their involvement with the financial backers of Nazi Germany.

The Guardian has obtained confirmation from newly discovered files in the US National Archives that a firm of which Prescott Bush was a director was involved with the financial architects of Nazism.

His business dealings, which continued until his company’s assets were seized in 1942 under the Trading with the Enemy Act, has led more than 60 years later to a civil action for damages being brought in Germany against the Bush family by two former slave labourers at Auschwitz and to a hum of pre-election controversy.

We will never know if George Bush gave any thought to his grandfather’s role in the creation of the Nazi camps while he toured a memorial to the horror they produced. One of his biggest flaws is his instinctive reflex to deflect responsibility for his own failings, so it is unlikely he’d see any connection between himself, the family fortune that paved his way to power and the portion of it that came from profits from his grandfather’s business dealings with Hitler’s government.

That would hit him a little too close to home.
3 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 3
Page 1 of 1
Meb452m read my blog
Jan 13, 2008 | 10:45 AM

Unless George Bush's grandfather,Prescott Bush, reported directly to and answered to Heinrich Himmler he would have had NO part in the creation of the slave labor camps.Being that Prescott Bush was a US Senator and resided in America was also put him out of the German chain of command that authorized and opperated these camps.

Inside the Thrid Reich, Memoirs by Albert Speer is written by the German Arms Minister of Nazi Germany. If you are intrested in any facts, you may find it intresting reading.

Right up until the very last days of that war, Germany was buying ammunition from Switzerland. This was purchased with gold taken from the Jewish population, a fair amount of it, in the form of teeth, removed from their mouths.

A good many of the Founding Fathers of this country and signers of the Constitution owned slaves. Are their relatives living today guilty ? Do their relatives wonder about any part their distant relatives might have played ? I don't think so. That would overlook a lot of people that caught,sold,bought,transported, and resold slaves. Are any of their distant relatives living today guilty ? I don't think so.

HOW ABOUT YOU ?

ThinkTanked read my blog view my photos
Jan 13, 2008 | 8:30 PM

Prescott Bush was George Bush Senior's father, there aren't too many people alive today whose father owned slaves. I'm willing to bet if any son's of those who owned slaves were alive there is a good chance they would be racist themselves being raised by the slave owner. With that said there's a good chance Bush Sr. is partial to the Hitler regime since that's where his dad made all of his money during WWII. You're comparing 6 generations of time to 3.. it's a bit different. Just think of how bad racism was only 3 generations ago.

Meb452m read my blog
Jan 14, 2008 | 6:36 PM

ThinkTanked, I won't be the first person to call this to your attention, but you might want to actually read some of the print before you. The article says Prescott's company assets were seized in 1942. It also alluded that he played some part in the creation of the consentration camps. As I stated,that fell under the adminiostration of Hinreich Himmler, a well documented fact. I also listed a reference, but in order to utilize that you will have to be able to read and comprehend the information presented. Are you up to a realitively simple task ? You obviously have little knowledge as to slaves, because as stated : they were caught,sold,bought,transported,and resold as slaves. There were a large number of people involved in ths trade other than the FINAL owner. Wheter it's six generations or three, none of them are liable for the actions unless they were participants as well ! I didn't comment on Bush's statement : "We should have bombed Aushwitz to stop the killing ". At the time others argued similarly, the consensus was it would have cost more lives is justifiable. But again that is in a book about history and you would have had to read it.

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




thorn

"If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, people will believe it." -- Adolf Hitler

Member Since: 9/28/2006