didaskalos's Blog

Marriage = 1 man & 1 woman.

I agree, I've already voted for the amendment defining marriage as one man and one woman.

Ditto. BTW-- Canada right now is having to listen in their courts now the rights of Poligamist and Beastiality folks! No Joke! They are using the presedence that they meet the same criteria that the gay community has.. that they are outside of one man, one woman, and if Gays no longer can be discriminated against, then NOBODY can.

The add I see on TV show an elderly man and woman not married but friends that are victim to current laws, and its not being honest. You can assign ANYONE to be your legal rep, via a power of attny, living will, living trust, etc.

That's why I'm voting YES for Amendment #2

Those 2 old people on the commercial made a choice--not to get married. That is THEIR choice, not ours. If they want the same rights as married couples, then get married. Don't get the government involved!

Sure, vote to have someone's rights taken away. Amendments like this make me wanna puke. Just because a couple of right winged people want to define marriage doesn't mean we as a people should have to vote on it. This is unconstitutional, all men are created equal, even gay men. If they want to marry, who does it hurt? Does a baby die every time a gay couple kiss? (I actually heard someone telling that to a kid)

My baby sitters were gay, they helped raise me and I turned out fine. I'm a good student, good citizen who votes and teaches adults how to use a computer (McCain could benefit from one of my lessons). Why are you voting rights away from people? Might as well deny women the right to choose while you're at it. The government has no right to decide what makes a couple. It's not one man, one woman. It's two people who love each other.

Nightmare - it isn't taking away any rights, it is preserving the meaning of words by prohibiting the attempted redefinition of marriage by the homosexual crowd with a political agenda to try and force the acceptance of their deviant (and unnatural) lifestyles... so quit your puking or get a barf bag.

Darkness - Albie64 was NOT saying that we should redefine marriage to suit alternative unions. He said if you want the benefits then they (the old hetero couple) shold get married.

dks - the point is if you redefine marrriage to satisfy one groups particular tastes and grant them benefits accordingly, then where do you draw the line (people and animals, polygamy, etc.)? It is sick and destructive to society.