Oct 08, 2008 | 05:15 AM PST
Report This Post
A US author, Jerome Corsi, is reported to have been deported from Kenya this week. He was accused of carrying a $1000 check to aid B. Hussein Obama's poverty stricken half brother who lives in a slum in Nairobi and "preparing" to make public statements critical of Obama and Kenyan officials. Corsi is the author of a book, The Obama Nation: Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality, which exposes the raw truth about Presidential candidate Obama. According to the China View, Corsi's troubles began shortly before a news conference to announce the launch of his book was set to begin when immigration authorities questioned Corsi. Pro-Obama youths protested outside the hotel, supporting Obama's candidacy for the US Presidency. One of the protesters was quoted as saying "It is bad propaganda and an affront to the people of Obama's father and grandfather". How the protesters were tipped off about the conference and subsequest deportation is not known.
It is not known if Hussein Obama or the US Democratic party leaders were directly involved in any request to silence Mr. Corsi. However, sadly, Obama's poor relations in Nairobi will not get the financial aid being delivered, leaving them still destitute.
Sources- NPR, AP, NYT
Oct 08, 2008 | 01:37 AM PST
Report This Post
The media needs to ask and get answers for the following questions from Obama:
1.
What precisely was the nature of Senator Obama’s relationship with
convicted real estate developer Tony Resko? Why did he engage in a real
estate deal with Rezko when he was under federal investigation? What
“advice” did he give Obama about buying a house in Chicago?
2. Why has Obama proclaimed that he has been fighting alongside ACORN, a radical leftwing organization, his “entire career”?
3. What exactly has been Obama’s experience with ACORN?
4. What was the nature of the “training” Obama provided to ACORN activists in Chicago?
5.
What exactly occurred during the “actions” that Obama organized as a
community organizer? Did the “actions” involve intimidation by any of
the participants Obama led?
6. Why did ACORN activists humiliate bankers into giving bad loans after Obama trained them?
7. Why did Obama seek ACORN’s endorsement in his state senate race?
8. What, if any, support did ACORN provide Obama in his 2004 Senate race?
9. Why was Obama silent on the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac reform package in 2005?
10. Why did Obama say that sub-prime lending was a “good thing”?
11. Why did Obama support $500 million a year going to ACORN-like organizations in the housing bailout this past summer?
12.
Why did the Woods Fund and the Joyce Foundation direct millions to
organizations such as ACORN while Obama was serving on the board of
those foundations?
13. Why did Madeleine Talbot, one time fiery leader of Chicago ACORN, invite Obama to help train their organizers in the 1990s?
14. Why did Obama attend a fundraiser at George Soros’s home during his 2004 campaign?
15. Why didn’t Obama return campaign contributions from George Soros?
16. Why did Obama vote to raise taxes on people making as little as $42,000 per year?
17.
Has Senator Obama or his campaign coordinated with St. Louis law
enforcement authorities who are threatening criminal libel charges
against critics of Obama who make statements that are found to by law
enforcement officials to be “false”?
18. Are the Obama
campaign’s “internet action alerts” directing supporters to overwhelm
call-in radio show that are critical of Obama consistent with the fair
and open campaign the Senator has pledged to run?
19. When did
Senator Obama first meet domestic terrorist William Ayers? Did Obama
know Ayres as a student at Columbia in the early 1980s?
Oct 07, 2008 | 11:07 PM PST
Report This Post
I've seen/heard the first two presidential debates and VP debate, but it's hard to get any more out of them than just watching a stump speach or press conference. Are they helpful to you? I don't remember any great lines/jabs from either side that would get people fired up. Maybe I'm just waiting/hoping for some more excitement and sparring between the candidates. but I guess for those not paying as close attention to the race, they could help show where each stands on certain issues.
what do you think? good? bad? want more?
how about an Obama/Palin debate...that'de be some good TV
Oct 07, 2008 | 10:52 PM PST
Report This Post
Even Brokaw could not shut Barry up!
He droned on and on past his allotted time.
McCain was total class, and did not even use all his time!
Barry is a product of 20 years of listening to the Rev. Wright!
McCain was truly speaking for America.
Speak softly and carry a big stick.
Obama is ready to attack Pakistan, or so he says. He would have to clear that through the Congress, just like Bush had to do to go into Iraq!
Obama is a dangerous man.
May God help us if he is elected.
Oct 07, 2008 | 10:06 PM PST
Report This Post
I heard something on the debate that has struck some thought with me..
Is healthcare a right or responsibility??
I guess something that I have to ask is America responsible with their health? I know this may sound naive, but it just occured to me how unhealthy America really is!! Eating the way we do, drinking, smoking, neglect and behaviors have contributed to the downfall of the basic health in this country...
What do you think Central Florida?? Are the rates 100% due to greed? Or are Americans selfishly endulging and neglected where they shouldn't? I used to work in the insurance industry..and the one thing I found interesting was the way employers hand picked the exact plan they wanted..I mean down to the tiniest detail..they said this and that..they dictated what they wanted, and how much they wanted to pay..often times, our company jumped through hoops and made exceptions to accomadate the businesses...so I have a little different take on "insurance"... would love to hear some talk on this...
Oct 07, 2008 | 09:42 PM PST
Report This Post
There have been many stories commenting on the crowd reaction at the latest rallies of VP candidate, Governor Sarah Palin. She has gone on the offensive against Sen. Obama in an extremely personal way. The attacks have been very inspiring to the crowds. There have been numerous reports of people yelling "terrorist" and at least one man has screamed "kill him" at yesterday's rally.
The anger of the crowd has also been directed towards the media. At least one African-American technician was called a "racial ephitaph" and then was told by another crowd member to "Sit down, BOY!".
Most people just see personal attacks as a sign that the McCain campaign is desperate and would rather talk about anything than the economy. And that is probably true! But to work a crowd up to the point where there are cries to KILL the opposing candidate takes this election into a very scary place. This is not the type of discourse that our founding fathers had in mind when they dreamed up this exotic scheme called "Democracy".
Because of Sen. Obama's unusual background he is very open to character attacks. His father is foreign born. Less than 8 years after the attacks of 9/11, his years in Muslim Indonesia give us even more to fear because we don't "know him" that well. His college teachings make him seem elitist and not "one of us". Many on the left would have you believe that these fears of Americans are nothing but blatant racism. But they are wrong. It is more than that and it is less than that. More because there are a great many Americans with legitimate objections to Sen. Obama's policies. Less because it is not just "rascism" like we think of during the Civil Rights Movement. There are no dogs & fire hoses or burning crosses. It's a kinder, gentler form of bias. But it is still a bias against that which we are not familiar with.
I think it is the combination of all of these things that make some of us wonder about Sen. Obama. He's not like other candidates we grew up with. But it is too simple to pin the problem on any one thing like racism. And lucky for John McCain because it gives him plenty of ammunition to attack with.
I think our fears have more to do with our buddy, Al! Who is Al, you ask? I don't know him...you do. We all know an Al in our life. "Al" is the person we see to be the exception to the stereotype.
We may not like immigrants because they are lazy and steal jobs and don't pay taxes...they're not like my pal Al, who I work with. He's ok. (Cause you know him.)
We like working for Al, he's not like most white people who try to keep a "brother" down. He's always got your back!
"AL" plays on my school's baseball team, his family eats funny food but he's a great pitcher!
"AL" just moved here from New York City, but he's pretty smart for a "city slicker"
I go to church with Al's wife and she's so sweet, not angry like a lot of "those" women!
You know Al. Maybe he's the gay man who's not like the "rest". Maybe he's the Hindu who waits on you at your favorite restaurant. But Al is the great hero in the battle against racism & predjudice in this country. He's the ONE you KNOW that helps you realize that all ethnic & cultural groups are composed of people. Some good and some bad. All you had to do to realize this is to get to know AL. He's basicly like you and me. Loves his wife and kids, wants to provide for them, wants to see his children grow up in the greatest nation on earth. It's hard to continue believing something about a culture, race, gender or whatever when you actually KNOW someone who is a part of that group. The "idealized" group becomes a little less real than the PERSON you know.
As Sen. Obama has become better known to more and more of the electorate, his favorability ratings have also increased. He's not so strange and foreign anymore to a larger portion of the electorate. He's becoming a political "AL".
This is natural. What is not natural is to try to stir up hatred and fear for a fellow American. It's wrong. Debate the issues. Discuss the failings of Obama's policies, but remember that he is still one of us. He may be wrong in his judgment but he is NOT a terrorist infiltrator. That's just silliness that gets promoted when someone gets behind in the polls.
So in the hopes of reminding everyone that Sen. Obama is an American, a father & a husband: here are some photos from his past. They look a lot like photos all of us have. They are part of America's Story. They should not influence you to vote for or against him because there is nothing special about them. They are a part of "Al's Story" and not the photos of a terrorist or traitor.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/03/the-obama
s-anniversary-al_n_131721.html?page=12&show_comment_id=
16417017#comment_16417017
We must focus not on the personal for this election but on the issues. We must vote for who we think will promise the best future for our children & grandchildren.
Oct 07, 2008 | 09:29 PM PST
Report This Post
Another obscure find ? Thanks PBS ! I'm not going to say it's due to cheapness, but my powered TV antenna does just fine. Watched a neat program tonight on PBS, WMFE Channel 24 , titled: Artic Dinosaurs. Intresting enough stuff to me , but for the global warming freaks here's a little fact. Granted it took some time to transpire, but here it is : Presently the North Slope of Alaska is 1,500 miles from the North Pole and is subject to 6 WEEKS of near total darkness during the dead of winter. However, 70 million years ago, the North Slope of Alaska was ONLY 345 miles from the North Pole and subject to 4 MONTHS of near total darkness during the dead of winter.
I'm no scientist, but I believe that such changes might tend to have an adverse effect on the ice cap. Information like that doesn't sell carbon offsets though, does it ?
Hey, I do everything I can to conserve and I'm learning and getting better by the day. But hear me Albert Gore, you can ride in your jet. I, the one with the F-150 in the driveway ,with duals, reserve the right to fly the big BLUE OVAL ! Righteously so, I might add ! LOL !!!!
Oct 07, 2008 | 07:45 PM PST
Report This Post
Media bias, Ya think?
Listening to the mainstream media these last few days I've learned a few things about the GOP's VP nominee but also had to learn a few things on my own. To wit:
1. From the media I learned Sarah Palin's husband has a DUI conviction from 22 years ago. On my own I learned that Ted Kennedy (hero of last week's tribute at the DNC) was drunk while driving a car off a bridge in Chappaquiddick. That same crash killed a young campaign volunteer with whom he was having an affair. Oh, and that woman was pregnant with his child. * Mr. Palin's (who is not running for office) DUI came a mere 4 years after Barack Obama (who is running for president) stopped using cocaine and marijuana (by his own admission in his autobiography). Shocking - it's OK for the presidential candidate to use drugs or the party patriarch to kill someone while driving drunk yet the husband of a VP candidate should be demonized for something done 22 years ago.
2. From the media I learned that Sarah Palin's daughter is pregnant.* On my own I learned that Joe Biden's (the other VP candidate) son was paid a large amount of money as a consultant to credit card company MBNA. That same company had business before Senator Joe Biden concerning regulation of consumer credit practices. After the company paid a hefty sum to Mr. Biden's son, he voted in favor of legislation to help that company.
* That same so n, Hunter, is also engaged in a legal investigation and suit for defrauding a former business partner.
Shocking - it's a crime for the republican VP candidate to have a child who's pregnant even though it's irrelevant to how she performs her job. It's ok, however, for the democrat VP candidate while a senator to vote in favor of a company who paid his son over a quarter of a million dollars.
3. From the media I learned that Sarah Palin should be considered 'selfish' for agreeing to run for VP knowing about her daughter's condition. Knowing that her public role would bring extra scrutiny on the family is selfish and she should have declined to protect he r child. (actually heard this on ABC this weekend).
Strange - the same people who said Sarah is selfish for running for VP did not seem to care about any impact on Chelsea when Bill Clinton had his dalliance with Monica Lewinsky. That was a private, personal matter you see.
4. From the media I have learned to be 'concerned' that Sarah Palin probably won't be able to manage her family and do an effective job of being VP at the same time.
Funny - I never heard anything about Hillary's ability to support Chelsea while redoing healthcare or any of the other feminist icons who say you can balance work and family. They also never mention that Barack will have to balance time with his children while meeting with heads of rogue nations or how Joe Biden's kids don't even have a mom and will be fighting for his time while he hosts white house coffee fundraisers and sells nights in the Lincoln bedroom.
5. From the media I have learned that Sarah Palin is 'too inexperienced' to be a heartbeat-away from the presidency.* Apparently taking on corruption in your own party and running a state that's the same size people-wise as Delaware (hint hint: that's where Joe Biden is from) is not really experience.* However, time spent as a 'community organizer' and less than 180 days in the senate where you've authored no significant legisl ation is just the type of 'change' we're looking for from the top of the ticket.
Funny - inexperience at the top of the ticket is a mantra for 'change' and 'hope' while strong practical everyday experience as the #2 is cause for concern.
6. From the media I learned that Sarah Palin's husband once got a ticket for fishing without a license. * I haven't heard much about the fact that if he were still a practicing attorney, the VP candidate Joe Biden would be disbarred for plagiarism not once but multiple times. It's ok to break the rules if you're a democrat candidate but not Ok if you are the spouse of a republican candidate.
7. From the media I learned that Sarah Palin doesn't know much about Iraq; in fact we wonder if she even knows where it is. *
WHAT? Sarah's son volunteered into the US military and is now deployed in Iraq. I guess that doesn't count. Sara h has spent more time with troops in Iraq (as commander of the Alaska National Guard she visited Iraq last year) than Obama has even while running for president. In fact, when Sarah went to Iraq she spent time with the troops. When Obama went there, he skipped a base visit to instead go work out at the Ritz Carlton.
8. From the media I learned that Sarah Palin is a 'lightweight' and she better be a 'quick study' to keep up with this team.
FUNNY, nobody is talking about how, after Barack Obama had 'visited 57 states' according to him he only had '5 more to go' or endless other stupid gaffes that expose who he really is.
9. From the media I have learned that (gasp!), Sarah Palin's husband was once a registered member of a 3rd party that favored states' rights (man, this is really bad stuff).
* AND YET That same media has been silent to the story that when Barack Obama announced his first senate run, he did so in the home of William Ayers. Mr. Ayers is an un-repentant terrorist convicted for bombing the pentagon. This same Mr. Ayers said on 9/11 that he and his group did not do enough to harm our military and he wished he had done more. During the same time as that comment, he was serving on a board with Barack Obama. All notes and information about their serving together is now locked up by the corrupt Chicago machine and reporter access to those records are being blocked by the Obama campaign.
If we've had any doubts about the bias of the media, it's pretty clear now where they stand. Pass this on to some of your friends who are on the fence and who get all their information from Katie Couric, Wolf Blitzer, Tom Brokaw and that gang. This is egregious and corrupt! The only way to stop it is to spread information using other outlets and make these guys irrelevant.
Oct 07, 2008 | 07:28 PM PST
Report This Post
McCain or Obama? I’m torn. The last eight years have been tumultuous, to say the least, and I have seen enough fear mongering to last a lifetime. Still, I want to hear McCain and Obama tonight. Perhaps this won’t be as boring as the last two debates. Perhaps McCain will actually talk about issues, perhaps Obama will say something awful and ruin my confidence in him. Trust is the problem. I trust Obama and McCain both as men, but men are human. I think they’re decent men, but I don’t really “trust” either of them. Perhaps it’s the cynic in me, or maybe the genius! LOL Okay… what I’m saying is that I feel they both missed their big chance to prove to us that they are Mavericks for Change!
Everywhere I looked, people were saying “no” to the bailout, all the while Obama and McCain were holding hands and skipping along with Bush toward the treasury to print up some fresh cash. Enough dollars to go around the equator 2,924 times, when laid end to end. This whole thing reeks of a conspiracy to gain political power. But I digress. (I always wanted to say that)
There seemed to be a conspiracy in the stock market. The day the deal is dropped, stocks take a nosedive but somehow quickly come back up. A lot of people bought low and sold high. And, somewhere in this “matrix” electronic world of money, some folks sent America a message. They told us what they would do if they didn’t get their way. They scared people into doing their bidding.
Back to the campaign... Two parties were negotiating their way through a maze of subtleties, trying to pass a bill while winning the next election. Watch out for little children. They have been armed with wooden arrows. The pigs are running the farm, the pork is flying. Why did people say “no” to a bailout one day, then ball up like schoolyard sissies for Puerto Rican rum the next? Why did the President, the Senate, and The House, all go against us? Is there anyone on our side?
I have already decided to vote NO to those that voted YES on the bailout, but it seems the only viable candidates have both done just that. So I am selling my soul and picking one of them. I’m only human. I will be watching the debate tonight with a critical eye on both candidates. That’s all I have to say about that.
How important is this debate to you?
How important is this election to you?
Do you really trust either of these men or their VP picks?
How will their vote on the bailout affect your vote?
Oct 07, 2008 | 07:13 PM PST
Report This Post
As we get closer to the election we have the moonbats coming out in droves, and we fight these moonbats with debate...............except they are pulling their typical moonbat crapola!
CYNPRO Censors all her blogs and only allows other moonbats comment to post...except she feels the need to comment on everybodys elses post...(HYPOCRIT!)
WILLIAMWIGGS Is deletest, he deletes comment from anybody who disagrees with him.
JEOK is a deletest he does the samething willy does.
ASSHANKY is a cut and paste queen, but refuses to back up his lies when confronted, but post something about his Messiah and he damands answer. Not to mention his rediculous bets trying anything in his powers to shut people out and try to get them off the site........I guess he just wants to blog with other MOONBATS.....their are site like that ASSHANKY....why dont you go there?
ASSHANKY is also the first to call us unpatriotic and the countrys enemy, Let me tell ya something ASSHANKY I VOLENTEERED 6 years of my life to the UNITED STATES NAVY and I have been an active member in the PATRIOT GUARD RIDERS for the last 21/2 years and have attended more than 96 funnerals of fallen soldiers and have stood holding the American flag for hours during these services in the middle of the summer and in the middle of the winter....did I mention this was all outside?...without complaint!
BTW ASSHANKY I live in Colorado so we don't get the nice weather Florida has in the winter
SO TELL ME ASSHANKY! WHAT HAVE YOU DONE FOR AMERICA?
These people are the epitomy of what is trying to take over America, just think of the rights Americans stand to lose if these commies get control.
Oct 07, 2008 | 07:03 PM PST
Report This Post
I am one of the unwilling participant that found out I have been supporting Obama and his campaign without knowing it or being told any different! I feel VIOLATED! My Rights VIOLATED!
You want to know just how much of a back stabbing dagger Obama really is to the American People…Well try taking campaign support from us without our permission, (because it’s legal), forcing us (those who do not support him), to sponsor his campaign (because its legal)! Here’s how….
He has his own Station in which is included within your satellite or cable channels! Now, the station as you will see title “Obama’s Plan for America” (Paid Ad)! I don’t know what the number channel would be for anything else but for Dish Network ~ channel 73~Obama! So just to let all you unwilling victims know….You are supporting him rather you like it or not!!!
Now I’m wondering! Is forced unwilling campaign support Legal? How do you feel about supporting someone campaigning whom you don’t support? Is this the kind of person for the position of Commander & Chief….someone who is already using the people rather they like it or not?
I shouldn't have to support something unless I so choose to expecially when it comes to political gain nor should I be forced into providing support! I don't send McCain money so what makes Obama so all mighty? I HAVE BEEN VIOLATED UPON!!!
BOOP-BOOP-A-DOOP
Oct 07, 2008 | 07:00 PM PST
Report This Post
THE POLL: CBS News poll, national presidential race among likely voters.
THE NUMBERS: Barack Obama 48%, John McCain 45%
OF INTEREST: This poll, showing the race basically even among likely voters, finds a tighter contest than most other surveys have measured recently.
57% are confident Obama would make the right decision about the economy.
53% say McCain would.
DETAILS: Conducted Oct. 3-5 by landline and cell telephones with 875 registered voters, sampling error margin PLUS OR MINUS 3 PERCENTAGE POINTS.
- Associated Press
So lets see. 48 to 45, with a 3 point error margin. Not the crowing victory all you libs have been spewing all over this blog.
Care to dispute?
Oct 07, 2008 | 06:00 PM PST
Report This Post
Oct 07, 2008 | 03:40 PM PST
Report This Post
The Execs are LIVING it UP.....
From;;
The Business Sheet;
Needed A Break!
Jay Yarow
Imagine watching the international company you run fall apart. Now imagine you've got to work double time to keep the company from destroying the global economy because you've involved your company in many businesses around the world.
Everyday you wake up and the newspaper is hammering your boneheaded decisions. Meanwhile CNBC has ten people at once talking about your failures. Finally, you go hat in hand to the government who reluctantly gives you the money you need to protect the world against the mess you made.
Ugh, feels stressful just thinking about it. Afterwards, you probably want "Me" time to recuperate, correct? Okay, good. Now that you've been through what the AIG execs have been through, we hope you won't judge them too harshly:
Less than a week after the federal government committed $85 billion to bail out AIG, executives of the giant AIG insurance company headed for a week-long retreat at a luxury resort and spa, the St. Regis Resort in Monarch Beach, California, Congressional investigators revealed today.
AIG documents obtained by investigators show the company paid more than $440,000 for the retreat, including nearly $200,000 for rooms, $150,000 for meals and $23,000 in spa charges.
"Less than one week after the taxpayers rescued AIG, company executives could be found wining and dining at one of the most exclusive resorts in the nation,"
And they SAY that CRIME doesn’t PAY….
Oct 07, 2008 | 03:30 PM PST
Report This Post
P
RESS STATEMENT OF LARRY SINCLAIR
J
UNE 18, 2008
Good afternoon, my name is Larry Sinclair and I am a former recreational drug user and
trafficker, a convicted felon for crimes of forgery, bad checks and theft by check. I am also an
American who loves this country and I cannot stay silent regarding Barack Obama knowing
what I know.
Today I will discharge my obligation as a citizen to witness this knowledge to you and
raise questions for others to investigate and consider. I am going to briefly describe my
background, my experience with Senator Obama in 1999, what appears to me to be a
coordinated effort to discredit me and finally a list of questions. After this brief statement, I will
take and try to answer any reasonable questions.
Background
I am 46 years old and I currently reside in Duluth, MN. I am a US Citizen, and I have
made mistakes in my lifetime. I have been convicted and served prison sentences for writing
bad checks, forging checks, using stolen credit card numbers in Arizona, Florida and Colorado.
These event’s occurred over twenty (20) years ago between 1980 thru 1986.
After going public on the internet with these claims against Senator Obama earlier this
year, I became aware of a warrant out of Florida from 1986 which I have resolved and it has now
been dismissed. I also have an active “Colorado Only” warrant for alleged “Theft and Forgery”.
I am not ignoring this warrant but am addressing it with the Court in Colorado as well as with
the DA’s office. I have a pending motion to dismiss this warrant which I am waiting to have
calendared by the Colorado Court.
I have lived and worked under three different names. My birth name is Lawrence W.
Sinclair. Later on, I had my name legally changed first to La-Rye A. Silvas, and then La-Rye
Vizcarra Avila. The last two were legal name changes granted by the court in Penal County
Superior Court, Florence Arizona. I legally returned to my birth name in the Fremont County
District court, Canon City, Colorado in 1997.
Obama Incident
I flew out of Colorado Springs, Colorado to Chicago on November 2, 1999, arriving in
O'Hare early in the morning of November 3, 1999. I went to the Chicago area to attend the
graduation of my god son (my best friend’s son) from basic training from the Great Lakes Navy
Training Center. I made reservations at the Comfort Inn and Suites in Gurnee, IL based on
location to the Navy Training center.
On November 5, 1999, I hired the services of Five Star Limo. I had hired them for both
November 5 and November 6. On November 6, 1999, I asked the limo driver – whose name I
Page 2 of 5
now reveal for the first time – Paramjit Multani, if he knew anyone who would like to socialize
and show me Chicago. Paramjit Multani understood that I was not looking for someone who
knew Chicago and would enjoy socializing. Paramjit Multani said he knew someone who was a
friend of his.
On November 6, 1999 after picking me up at the Hotel in Gurnee– and this is significant
– Paramjit Multani used his cellphone to make a call. That call was made to then-Illinois State
Senator Barack Obama to set up an introduction between me and Senator Obama. Upon arriving
at the bar and exiting the Limo, Senator Obama was standing next to Paramjit Multani and I was
introduced to Senator Obama. Later that evening at a bar which I believe was called Alibis, I
mention I could use a line or two to wake up. Senator Obama asked me if I was referring to
“coke” and after stating I was, Obama stated he could purchase cocaine for me and then made a
telephone call – and this too is significant -- from his cellphone to a presently unknown
individual during which Senator Obama arranged the cocaine purchase.
Senator Obama and I then departed the bar in my limousine and proceeded to an
unknown location where Senator Obama exited the limousine with two hundred fifty dollars
($250) I had given him and returned a short while later with an “eightball” of cocaine which he
gave to me. I did ingest a couple of lines of cocaine, and shortly thereafter Senator Obama
produced a glass cylinder pipe and packet of crack cocaine from his pants pocket and Obama
smoked the crack cocaine. I performed fellatio on Senator Obama in the limousine during the
time Senator Obama was smoking crack cocaine, after which I had the driver take me to the my
hotel, The Comfort Suits, Gurnee, Illinois.
The following day, November 7, 1999, Senator Obama appeared at my hotel room where
we again ingested cocaine and I again performed fellatio on Senator Obama.
Significantly, both the driver’s telephone call to Senator Obama and his call to the drug
dealer should appear on the driver’s and Senator Obama’s cellphone billing statements.
Fall 2007
In September 2007 I contacted the Presidential Campaign of Barack H. Obama, to
request solely that Senator Obama publicly correct his stated drug use record to reflect his use of
crack cocaine with me in November 1999. When I made that first contact I left with the
Presidential Campaign of Senator Barack H. Obama a telephone number for the campaign to
return my call. The first number I provided was a Texas cell phone number.
From the period of Labor day weekend 2007 through November 18, 2007 I did provide a
total of four (4) different call back numbers to the Obama campaign, as I had moved and had
changed the numbers to reflect locally my place of residence at the time. In late September to
early October 2007, I received a call from a male who identified himself as a “Mr. Young”
stating he was calling in regards to calls I had made to the Obama campaign. This first call was
in fact an attempt by “Mr. Young” to obtained from me the identities of anyone I had contacted
concerning my 1999 allegations against Senator Obama. This first called shocked me in that this
Page 3 of 5
“Mr. Young” asked me why I had not asked Senator Obama to disclose the sexual encounters I
had with Mr. Obama in 1999. I was shocked as I had never mentioned to the campaign or
anyone working for the campaign any sexual encounters as my call was prompted by drug
allegations only. The call ended with “Mr. Young” stating I would hear from someone in a few
days.
In mid to late October 2007, I received a second call from this “Mr. Young” at which
time I clearly became aware that this individual was personally involved with Senator Obama
rather than just an employee of his campaign. The tone of the conversation had a sexual nature.
“Mr. Young” did not once advise me how he obtained my phone number which by this time had
now changed to a Delaware number.
In late October 2007, I received a text message from the gentleman identified as “Mr.
Young” in which he stated he was intimately involved with Senator Obama and that Obama was
discussing with him and his pastor how to publicly acknowledge Senator Obama’s drug use in
1999 and that Obama wanted to be sure I had not discussed the sexual encounters or drug
incidents with any media at that time.
In mid to late November 2007, in another text message from “Mr. Young” , he advised
me that Senator Obama will publicly correct his statement as to the last time he used drugs and I
did not need to concern myself with publicly disclosing it myself.
The last contact I had with “Mr. Young” was in early December 2007 when he made it
clear to me that Senator Obama had no intentions of publicly acknowledging his 1999 use of
crack cocaine and that “Mr. Young” was in fact doing nothing more than milking information
from me for Senator Obama’s use.
I later learned that a Donald Young was the choir director of Reverend Wright’s Trinity
United Church of Christ – Obama's now-former church -- and was openly a homosexual. I also
learned that he was murdered on December 23, 2007.
I have cooperated with the Chicago Police Department in this matter by providing them
the telephone numbers I was using during the fall of 2007 and I release them now publically in
the hope that someone may be able to connect the dots between these telephone numbers and
Mr. Young. Those numbers are: 954-758-1105; 956-758-1885; 956-758-8002; 302-685-7175;
612-466-1043.
2008
In what I now realize was a naive and un-counseled decision, I posted in January 2008 a
video on YouTube.com where I related the above information regarding my liaisons with
Senator Obama in 1999. The response was overwhelming and I quickly became the recipient of
what in hindsight appears to have been a coordinated attack on my character with ever increasing
falsehoods circulating on the internet.
Page 4 of 5
In response I agreed to take a polygraph test from Whitehouse.com. The results of that
test have been partially revealed to the end of labeling me a liar and taken as gospel by all.
I would like to make the following comments about that polygraph test. First, I have
been subsequently advised that Whitehouse.com was a website dedicated to anti-Clinton
pornography until earlier this year. Second, I have now come to understand that lie detectors are
junk science at best which is why courts of law refuse to use them. Third, a review of the results
by George W. Maschke, Ph.D. of AntiPolygraph.org raises serious questions about the
legitimacy of the examination. Indeed, overlooked by almost everyone is that Whitehouse.com’s
own examiner, Dr. Gordon Barland, observed that on the drug question regarding Senator
Obama that the computerized score found that there was less than a 1% probability of deception
by me. That's about as high a passing score as one can possibly attain.
Finally, in February 2008 I was told anonymously that Dan Parisi of Whitehouse.com
received $750,000 from the Obama campaign through AKR Media to organize an effort to
publically discredit me. When I confronted Dan Parisi with this allegation, he did not deny it but
instead withdrew the second exonerating polygraph report of Dr. Gordon Barland, failed to post
the video of my polygraph as he and Whitehouse.com promised they would do, and even
removed posts from their web site altogether, claiming that they had "had enough of the attacks
by Sinclair's supporters and Sinclair himself.”
The polygraph results - as misrepresented – were immediately seized upon by the blogger
community and I became the subject of vicious lies about me. I was forced to file a lawsuit in an
attempt to stop those lies about me that have been circulating. That lawsuit sought to obtain the
proof of what I was saying about my contact with Senator Obama through subpoenas for the
identities of the anonymous bloggers so they could be linked to the Obama campaign and
relevant records of the cellphone companies to prove the truth of my allegations. To date,
though the lawsuit is now over ninety days old, Judge Kennedy has refused to permit the suit to
move forward so this evidence may be obtained.
Conclusion
In sum, you can discredit my story and then make your decision on who should be the
next President of the United States. The burden is now off me as I have told my story without
the distortions that have been intentionally heaped on me in what my lawyer tells me is an
hominem
am now done. It is for others to find the corroborating evidence of my story by locating the
limousine driver – Paramjit Multani – and the telephone numbers related to Donald Young
and/or Senator Obama. I leave you with these questions that I have asked of Senator Obama but
which he – who wants to be the next President of the United States – has refused to answer:
1. Why won’t Senator Obama provide his cellphone numbers and telephone
records for all his personal and official cell phones held by him for the time
period of November 3, 1999 thru November 8, 1999, when we met?
Page 5 of 5
2. Why won’t Senator Obama provide his cellphone numbers and telephone
records for all his personal and official cell phones held by Senator Obama for
September 2007 – December 23, 2008, the murder of Donald Young?
3. Why won’t Senator Obama provide all email communication both
personal and campaign related to and/or from AKP Message & Media from
January 18, 2008 through February 29, 2008 for Senator Obama, David Axelrod
and David Plouffe?
4. Why won’t Senator Obama provide proof of all payments made from
AKP Message & Media, Obama for America, David Axelrod, David Plouffe, and
Senator Obama’s accounts for the period of January 18, 2008 through February
29, 2008?
On my website – larrysinclair.org – you will find the documents that I have referred to in
this statement. A copy of the home page for that website is attached.
Thank you for your time and attention this afternoon and I will now take any questions
adattack – shoot the messenger so you don’t have to hear the message he is bringing. I
Oct 07, 2008 | 03:21 PM PST
Report This Post
LARRY SINCLAIR
600 W Superior Street, #604
Duluth, MN 55802
March 10, 2008
Senator Barack Obama
713 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Senator Barack Obama
230 S. Dearborn Street, Ste. 3900
Chicago, IL 60604
Mr. David Axelrod
AKP Message & Media
730 N. Franklin Street, Ste. 404
Chicago, IL 60610
RE: REQUEST FOR CELL PHONE AND EMAIL RECORDS
Dear Senator Obama and Mr. Axelrod:
I am submitting this written request asking that you and Mr. Axelrod authorize the release of the following:
1. Cell Phone numbers, service providers for all personal and official cell phones held by
Senator Obama for the time period of November 3, 1999 thru November 8, 1999.
2. Cell phone numbers, service providers for all personal and campaign phones for Senator
Obama, David Axelrod, David Plouffe from January 18, 2008 to current date or at the
least through February 29, 2008.
3. All email communication both personal, campaign related and AKP Message & Media’s
from January 18, 2008 through February 29, 2008 for Senator Obama, David Axelrod
and David Plouffe.
4. All payouts made from AKP Message & Media, Obama for America, David Axelrod,
David Plouffe, and Senator Obama’s accounts for the period of January 18, 2008 through
February 29, 2008.
This request is being made based on your statement that you intend to bring a new politics to America, a
politics of openness, and accountability. The records being requested here can bring to light and/or put to
rest claims made about your involvement with Dan Parisi of Whitehouse.com and the rigged polygraph
arranged; can if you claim you never met me (as is exactly the claim made by David Axelrod directly to
John Crewdson of the Chicago Tribune) show you to be lying or telling the truth by releasing your cell
phone records etc…
It would seem to me that you would be more interested in getting this matter settled than your continued
organized attacks on the internet.
I respectfully request you respond to this request without delay. I strongly urge you to consider that you
yourself can if these things are , as your staff continue to claim, untrue, then your agreeing to release these
records should not be a difficult thing for you to do.
Sincerely,
Larry Sinclair
LARRYSINCLAIR.ORG
Oct 07, 2008 | 03:16 PM PST
Report This Post
March 2, 2008
Senator Barack Obama
713 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Senator Barack Obama
230 S. Dearborn Street, Ste. 3900
Chicago, IL 60604
Mr. David Axelrod
AKP Message & Media
730 N. Franklin Street, Ste. 404
Chicago, IL 60610
RE: Questions
Dear Senator Obama and Mr. Axelrod:
I am writing the two of you this letter because phone calls continue to be ignored. I feel it is only fair that I
address the following questions to the two of you directly one last time.
1. Who is Ron Allen that claims to be with your Presidential camp, who is alleged to claim that
someone claiming to represent me called asking for $100,000, to keep me from coming forward about our
(Obama and I) November 1999 encounter of sex and cocaine use?
2. How can the two of you stand in front of this country talking about bring people together at the
same time you both have engaged your supporters in a massive internet smear against me where you are
providing knowing false information to your paid bloggers for the purpose trying to keep the truth about
you Mr. Obama from coming out?
3. How can you claim to be a uniter at the same time you are encouraging your supporters to threaten
to blow my head off, to cut my throat and to set me on fire if I do not recant my statements?
4. How can either of you gentleman claim to be concerned about truth when you and Mr. Axelrod
engaged in a payoff deal with Dan Parisi of Whitehouse.com to the tune of $750,000, to arrange a rigged
polygraph?
5. Do you truly believe (that after you two have gone to the extent that you have to have me smeared
on the internet with outright false statements) I will go away? Because if you do, I want to tell you right
now that the only thing you have done by having my life repeatedly threatened, and by repeatedly
providing out right false information for your supporters to post about me on the web, is to make certain
that I will not go away and I will not rest until the truth about you both is across every headline around the
world.
6. If you claim that neither of you have had nothing to do with the internet attacks and false
statements, then prove, post it on your web site and denounce any such attacks. I know you will not
because a great deal of the false information has come directly from Mr. Axelrod and his associates.
7. If you claim you had no involvement in the Whitehouse.com scam, then prove it. Publicly
denounce Dan Parisi’s getting me to agree to his scam and then stopping payment on his check.
8. If you and Mr. Axelrod claim you had no involvement with Dan Parisi open up your accounts and
the accounts of AKP and David Axelrod for review to prove it.
It needs to be made clear that I will not be threatened nor will I allow you to feed completely false
information about me to your bloggers and then just fade away into the sunset. Let me make it clear that
your attacks against me have only hardened my resolve to see that this story gets out and you are exposed
for what both of you truly are.
Sincerely,
Larry Sinclair
LARRYSINCLAIR.ORG,,,,, CHECK HIS SITE OUT
Oct 07, 2008 | 02:58 PM PST
Report This Post
The dollar is up and the price of oil is down.
What happened to "drill baby, drill?"
What happened to the world shortage of oil that was supposedly responsible for such huge increases in price in addition to having a depressed dollar?
If there is to be a push for developing alternative/green energy sources, wouldn't now be the time?
Will Palin and McCain begin pushing for the development of alternative energy sources with the same enthusiasm that they previously demonstrated towards drilling, now that the public is getting some relief at the gas pump?
Oct 07, 2008 | 01:57 PM PST
Report This Post
When I was in elementary school in D.C., the students had to pick an electon song. (it was always a song we only voted for because our teacher said it was good) I don't know what you do in FL.
So how do you prepare do you prepare your kids and grandkids old enough to vote for the electon? Get them excited that there will be a new president?
Do you even do anything to get them and yourself excited?
...Probably not, but it doesn't hurt to ask.
For the record, if I had to pick a song for this year's electon, I'd choose Future in My Hands by Aimee B. Great song, a foreign song, but good. If you want to hear it, I'll try to post the song on the music message board, but I can only find it on YouTube with violent footage...so far.
Let's get excited for a new (and hopefully better) President.
Oct 07, 2008 | 01:19 PM PST
Report This Post
THE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES CAN MAKE ALL THE PROMISES THEY WANT. BUT THE FACT IS THEY CAN'T KEEP THOSE PROMISES WITHOUT THE COOPERATION OF THE SENATE AND CONGRESS. THEY ARE THE PEOPLE WHO RUN THIS COUNTRY. THE PRESIDENT DOES NOT. HE HAS SOME SAY IN THE DAY-TO-DAY EVENTS BUT HIS GREATEST POWER IS THE RIGHT TO VETO WHATEVER CAPITAL HILL PUTS IN FRONT OF HIM. I JUST WISH THAT THE PEOPLE ON CAPITAL HILL WOULD PUT FORTH CHANGES IN THE SOCIAL SECURITY, HEALTH CARE, BANKING INDUSTRY, ETC., WITHOUT ADDING A BUNCH OF PORK TO THESE ISSUES. EVERY OCTOBER WHEN THE NEW BUDGETS ARE DUE TO GO INTO EFFECT, THEY ARE HELD UP BECAUSE UP ON CAPITAL HILL THEY HAVE TO ADD THE ABORTION BILL, A NEW SOMETHING OR OTHER FOR THEIR STATE. LEAVE THAT BLEEP OFF AND PASS JUST THE BUDGET FOR THE AGENCY.
Oct 07, 2008 | 12:44 PM PST
Report This Post
100-Plus Former Ambassadors Endorse McCain
Sunday, October 5, 2008 9:38 PM
By: Ronald Kessler
Article Font Size
More than 100 former American ambassadors are endorsing John McCain and Sarah Palin for president and vice president.
To be announced by the McCain campaign later this week, the endorsements counter Barack Obama’s claims that McCain is inflexible when it comes to diplomacy and negotiations with other countries, Newsmax has learned.
Obama has specifically said that in contrast to McCain, he would sit down with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and other world dictators to negotiate, without preconditions.
“Senator Obama does not have sufficient leadership experience, nor has he been tested in difficult times,” said Mark W. Erwin, a Democrat and former Hillary Clinton supporter who is a co-chairman of Former U.S. Ambassadors for McCain/Palin. Erwin was ambassador to the Republic of Mauritius.
Endorsing McCain are Howard Baker, who was ambassador to Japan; former President George H.W. Bush, who was ambassador to the United Nations; Frank C. Carlucci III, who was ambassador to Portugal; and Jim Nicholson, who was ambassador to the Vatican.
Others endorsing McCain are Bruce Gelb, former ambassador to Belgium; Margaret Heckler, who was ambassador to Ireland; John L. Loeb, Denmark; Ed Ney, Canada; and Julia Chang Bloch, Nepal.
Former Ambassador Gilbert A. Robinson spearheaded the formation of the group. Besides Erwin, the other co-chairman is former Ambassador to Sweden Gregory J. Newell. Robinson was special adviser to Secretary of State George Shultz, director of the Office of Public Diplomacy, and deputy director of the U.S. Information Agency under President Reagan. Newell was an assistant to President Ford and assistant secretary of state under Reagan.
Such designations carry ambassadorial rank and require Senate confirmation.
“Nobody could ask for a greater show of confidence,” McCain said in a statement to be released to the press. “These former ambassadors are outstanding men and women who have served their country in foreign lands with great distinction and devotion to the values we hold dear. They have a deep knowledge of the challenges facing this country abroad as well as at home. I am honored by their endorsement.”
The former ambassadors endorsing McCain are Weston Adams, Malawi; Thomas H. Anderson, Barbados; Leonore Annenberg, chief of protocol; Cresencio Arcos Jr., Honduras; George Argyros, Spain; Catherine Todd Bailey, Latvia; Howard H. Baker Jr., Japan; Douglas H. Barclay, El Salvador; Stuart A. Bernstein, Denmark; Everett E. Bierman, New Guinea; Julia Chang Bloch, Nepal; Stephen F. Brauer, Belgium; Keith Lapham Brown, Lesotho and Denmark; Richard R. Burt, Germany; George H.W. Bush, United Nations and U.S. Liaison Office (Beijing); William J. Cabaniss Jr., Czech Republic; Richard G. Capen Jr., Spain; Richard W. Carlson, Seychelles; Frank C. Carlucci III, Portugal; Bruce Chapman, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); Sue McCourt Cobb, Jamaica; Charles E. Cobb Jr., Iceland.
Also Walter J.P. Curley, Ireland and France; Peter H. Dailey, Ireland, special envoy to NATO countries; Richard J. Egan, Ireland; Mark L. Edelman, Cameroon; Donald Burnham Ensenat, Brunei, chief of protocol; Mark Erwin, Republic of Mauritius, the Republic of the Seychelles, and the Federal Islamic Republic of Comoros; Richard M. Fairbanks III, ambassador-at-large; William S. Farish III, United Kingdom, Versailles; Edward R. Finch Jr., Panama; David Funderburk, Romania; John R. Gavin, Mexico; Bruce S. Gelb, U.S. Information Agency (USIA), Belgium; Joseph B. Gildenhorn, Switzerland; Anthony H. Gioia, Malta; Luis Guinot Jr., Costa Rica.
Also Margaret M. Heckler, Ireland; Charles A. Heimbold Jr., Sweden; Hans H. Hertell, Dominican Republic; Alfred Hoffman Jr., Portugal; Charles W. Hostler, Bahrain; Philip Hughes, Barbados, Dominica, St. Lucia, St. Vincent and the Grenadines; Jon M. Huntsman Jr., Singapore; Robert S. Ingersoll, Japan; James C. Kenny, Ireland; Alfred H. Kingon, European Union; Lester B. Korn, UN Economic and Social Council; Tom C. Korologos, Belgium; Mary E. Kramer, Barbados and Eastern Caribbean; Paul C. Lambert, Ecuador; L.W. Lane Jr., ambassador-at-large and Australia and Nauru; Mark Langdale, Costa Rica; Howard Leach, France; Melvyn Levitsky, Bulgaria and Brazil; John L. Loeb Jr., Denmark; Earle I. Mack, Finland.
Also Susan Rasinski McCaw, Austria; Thomas Patrick Melady, Burundi, Uganda, Holy See; J. William Middendorf II, Netherlands, Organization of American States (OAS), European Union; John A. Miller, ambassador-at-large; Steve Minikes, Commission on Cooperation and Security in Europe (CSCE); Thomas A. Nassif, Morocco; Gregory J. Newell, Sweden; Edward N. Ney, Canada; Jim C. Nicholson, Holy See; Herman W. Nickle, South Africa; Julian M. Niemczyk, Czechoslovakia; Keith Foote Nyborg, Finland; John D. Ong, Norway; Penne Korth Peacock, Mauritius; Joseph Carlton Petrone, UN European Office; Charles J. Pilliod, Mexico; John Price, Mauritius, Seychelles and Comoros.
Also Charles H. Price II, Belgium, United Kingdom; James W. Rawlings, Zimbabwe; Otto J. Reich, Venezuela; Mercer Reynolds, Switzerland and Liechtenstein; Gilbert A. Robinson, special adviser to the secretary of state; Joe M. Rodgers, France; Sig Rogich, Iceland; John Rood, Bahamas; Francis L. Rooney III, Holy See; Bob Royall, Tanzania; Rockwell A. Schnabel, Finland, European Union; Peter F. Secchia, Italy; Martin J. Silverstein, Uruguay; Marion H. Smoak, chief of protocol; Ronald J. Sorini, chief textile negotiator, Office of the U.S. Trade Representative; Michael G. Sotirhos, Jamaica.
Also Robert D. Stuart Jr., Norway; Charles J. Swindells, New Zealand and Samoa; Peter Terpeluk Jr., Luxembourg; Timothy L. Towell, Paraguay; Rodolphe M. Vallee, Slovak Republic; Leon J. Weil, Nepal; John G. Weinmann, Finland, chief of protocol; Ronald N. Weiser, Slovak Republic; Pamela P. Willeford, Switzerland and Liechtenstein; Richard Williamson, assistant secretary, ambassador IAEA; Curtin Winsor Jr., Costa Rica; Dr. Aldona Z. Wos, Estonia; and Joseph Zappala, Spain.
Ronald Kessler is chief Washington correspondent of Newsmax.com. View his previous reports and get his dispatches sent to you free via
e-mail. Go here now.
© 2008 Newsmax. All rights reserved.
Oct 07, 2008 | 11:47 AM PST
Report This Post
Palin To Appear On SNL?
Posted by Brian Montopoli
As Saturday Night Live viewers well know, Tina Fey's much-talked-about impression of GOP vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin has not been kind to the Alaska governor. It may even have played a role in fixing the public perception of the candidate, which, at least until last week's vice presidential debate, has largely been on the decline since she exploded onto the national scene.
Now the Chicago Sun-Times reports that Palin may appear on Saturday Night Live herself, potentially to make fun of Fey's American Express commercials. Bill Zwecker reports that while some McCain staffers want Palin to simply keep joking about Fey's impression on the campaign trail – she wrote "I'm not Tina Fey" on one backer's cell phone – others believe it is important that she appear on the show herself.
Palin would be far from the first candidate to appear on SNL after an unflattering portrayal. Earlier this year, Hillary Clinton appeared on the show standing next to an identically-dressed Amy Poehler, who had mockingly portrayed her, presumably to show she is in on the joke.
----------------------------
So what do you think? Should Sarah Palin appear on Saturday Night Live? Why or why not?
Oct 07, 2008 | 10:45 AM PST
Report This Post
What we should be shaking our head about??
That this country nominated a man that the MEDIA refused to scrutinize back then....Hilary tried and was shut up by the media...
TAKE HIS CHARACTER DOWN McCain!!!! BE REAL!!!! Any man who ever worshipped at Trinity United Church of Christ should NEVER be president of this country!
Oct 07, 2008 | 08:19 AM PST
