MyFox
 

FOX 35's Blog

by WOFL from Lake Mary, Florida

Last Post 9 hours Ago



The Pentagon is recommending that troops' remains be incinerated at a facility that is dedicated entirely to humans. The new policy comes after revelations that crematoriums contracted by the military are used for both human and animal cremations. 

A top military official says the remains never mixed but they don't want to take any chances.

The plan is to now send all soldiers killed in action to their local funeral homes to avoid any problems. 

Time for you to blog it.

Bet plenty of you have opinions about this one

 

11 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 11
Page 1 of 1
Vancouver read my blog
May 9, 2008 | 10:17 PM

These men and women have died for our country and to have them cremated in the same crematories that animals are cremated in is very disrespectful. I think it is time for the Pentagon to change it's rules.

sensiblejoe
May 9, 2008 | 10:51 PM

Military or civilian, no human being's mortal remains ought to be cremated -- they ought to be buried respectfully. But if they must be cremated, it ought not to be in the same crematoriums used for animals. The human body is not just a worthless shell -- it is a vital part of our human identity, existence and experience that deserves honor and respect.

RandyLoo read my blog view my photos
May 9, 2008 | 10:58 PM

Are they cremated before being transported back home? Do our soldiers request this before going over? Who would think about doing it like this? I love my dog and I lost my other one in January, for me, I wouldn't mind being with her in eternity. She was like my child. But I can see where other people would not want this for themselves or our soldiers. Personally I don't like cremation either but many many many people use this method today.

BornToBeWild read my blog view my photos
May 9, 2008 | 11:33 PM

AND THEY ARE JUST FINDING THIS OUT????? Somebody dropped the ball big time!

PegasusWing read my blog view my photos
May 10, 2008 | 7:09 AM

The choice should always be left to the families, unless the soldier had previously written instructions.
Personally, I wouldn't want to be buried.

Droopyz read my blog
May 10, 2008 | 8:28 AM

Much ado about nothing...

The bodies were not cremated in the same incinerator as the animals... so, what's the big deal? Must be a slow news day. I am ex-Navy, I have much respect for all our military. But, if they choose to be cremated... does it matter that animals are cremated in the incinerator next door. Nope.

If they go home to be buried... the could be laid to rest next to some career criminal... so, let's do background checks on the dead that lie next to veterans...

Georgies-Girl read my blog view my photos
May 10, 2008 | 9:45 AM

I personally would prefer cremation. I think viewings of a dead body are prehistoric! People standing around a dead body telling each other how "GOOD" the dead person looks. Archaic! Disgusting! A dead body is just that. A dead body. The soul has already gone where it is going. What difference does it make if the shell is cremated? It would save a lot on shipping the remains, too. I have always HATED viewings! Having a memorial service in a church or hall is much more dignified and a lot easier on the family of the deceased! I want to remember any person who dies the way they were when they were alive...not what they looked like laying in a box! People go to viewings because they feel sorry for themselves ..probably because they didn't visit the person enough when they were alive - the only time you see some of your relatives is at a funeral. My better half and I both have cremation in our wills, so that there will be no question. Cremation in a kiln or incinerator next to where an animal is cremated? No problem. Dogs/cats are NOT criminals. They deserve to be taken care of, too.

PegasusWing read my blog view my photos
May 10, 2008 | 1:32 PM

My father was a powerful person in my life.
Somehow I thought that he would always be there.
Oh, I understood that the natural order of things is that we do lose our parents, but in my heart, I always expected him to be there.
I felt lost in a fog to know that I really was on my own, without ever again having the security of being able to come home to my Dad.
I think that I had to see the body to begin to believe that he was gone.
Still when I visited the family home, I half expected him to walk in.
The funeral is for the living.
We go to a funeral to give support to those left behind.
The gift of emotional support from family and friends is everything.
The widow is suppose to host the guest and know that she still has to rise to her obligations to her family and friends.
Nobody else likes funerals either.
Death is of a loved one is not something we are ever really prepared to accept.

Georgies-Girl read my blog view my photos
May 10, 2008 | 1:58 PM

A memorial service would do the same thing, Pwing. You can give support at a memorial service to the loved ones. And there is not a bunch of people standing around telling you how the departed never looked better! When they were alive, they looked better then when they are dead in a casket!

DeborahLakeHelen read my blog view my photos
May 10, 2008 | 2:58 PM

Why in the name of God would it have EVER been done any other way in the first place, for any American Soldier who served this country? What the new policy is suggesting, is that our BRAVE. DEDICATED soldiers were previously cremated with swine, equine, canine and feline remains! Now, that may be fitting for someone who was just relieved from Death Row, but it certainly isn't filling for someone who HONORABLY served this country. That just flat out makes me mad!

Gammies61 read my blog view my photos
May 12, 2008 | 11:52 AM

The soul is not the body. This is cremated remains. Dust. I see no disrespect here.

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




WOFL

The Fox 35 studio is located in Lake Mary, FL. Orlando's ultra high frequency Channel 35 first hit the airwaves March 31, 1974, under its originally assigned call letters, WSWB-TV.News Corp. subsidiary, Fox Television Stations Inc., currently owns and operates WOFL as well as sister stations WRBW-Channel 65 and WOGX-Fox 51 in Ocala.

Member Since: 7/17/2006