MyFox
 

Steve_Gehlbach's Blog

by Steve_Gehlbach from WOFL

Last Post 8 days, 19 hours Ago


a bill would make seat belts a primary offense...meaning cops could pull you over just for not buckling up. now, they need another reason, then can cite you for the seat belt.

 

is this a good idea?

those pushing the bill say it will save lives.

those against say it turns otherwise honest citizens, who aren't putting anyone else in danger, into criminals.

how far should the law go?

20 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 20
Page 1 of 1
Spectre read my blog view my photos
Mar 13, 2007 | 10:56 PM

SG, sorry didn't see your thread, so I started the topic. Spectre

ionpain
Mar 14, 2007 | 7:12 AM

I resent the comment made by Stuart Hodes, saying it's a privilage giving by the state to drive a car. If it's a privilage, then why do we pay for our cars, gas, insurance, and licenses. The state should pay for these things then. I don't think the police should have the right to pull you over if your not doing anything wrong. I think they should put they're focus on the one's who are drunk driving, speeding, etc.

Country676382
Mar 14, 2007 | 7:50 AM

My opinion is that if you are stupid enough not to wear your seatbelt then you pay the price. It shouldn't be enforced except I hope parents have enough sense to make sure their child is secure. They need to pay more attention to people running redlights. That is a major problem here in florida and is a big danger to other drivers. I see it every day. They need to concentrate more on this problem then seatbelts!!

mkkg
Mar 14, 2007 | 8:18 AM

The fact that seatbelts are mandatory but Law Enforcement can not stop us for not wearing one is idiotic. How much sense does it make...
We as a society are taking the ability of our Police to protect us away from them. The ability to stop us for seatbelt violations should be an option to Police. The more options our Police have to stop us and to check us out, the safer we will be.

mkkg
Mar 14, 2007 | 8:21 AM

what about helmets on Motorcycles...Should'nt those be mandatory too? kids have to be in a seatbelt oin a car but they can ride on the back of their parents bike?...DUH!!!

JohnnyP
Mar 14, 2007 | 8:27 AM

I just hung up phone! Cancelled AAA. encourage others to do same. AAA you are a not for profit org. remember? Stay out of the legislative. Concentrate here guys more on unlocking cars, bringing gas, towing cars,giving maps, and hotel discounts to members! If I am speeding, Driving under the influence, Road rage, Road racing, Driving Irratacly. Pull me over I am endangering others lives. Hey Mr Hodes what next because a thief breaks into my house finds my car keys drives off and is never caught am I adieing and abedding a thief? AAA stay out of my car!

purecountrie read my blog
Mar 14, 2007 | 8:31 AM

I made a comment to this topic, but I don't see it, so if there twice, I apologize.....
I do not believe that the seat belt law should be enforced....that should be an option, for us to choose. I do not believe that seat belt saves or kills, that is totally up to man upstairs, there is an awful lot of concern on the seat belts saving lives, but....a motorcyclist can ride without a helmet! Where's the concern there? To me, it's just another way for the to make money off of tickets....it's a bogus law....there are other concerns out there on the road, than someone NOT wearing their seat belt....

butterbutt
Mar 14, 2007 | 8:49 AM

I think it's a good idea. For those that don't like it, buckle your seat belt. How hard is it really? They're just concerned about saving peoples lives. Think about it. How many people have lost their lives because they didn't do something as simple as to buckle their seatbelt.

butterbutt
Mar 14, 2007 | 8:51 AM

And there is something wrong with that motorcycle helmet law.

Mr_Native read my blog view my photos
Mar 14, 2007 | 9:30 AM

Law enforcement can't even enforce the current traffic laws accordingly. What makes anyone think that this one will be any different?

PTCollins
Mar 14, 2007 | 9:40 AM

The statistics support the theory that seatbelts save lives. People should wear them and drivers should ensure everyone in the car wears them, as the driver is ultimately responsible regardless of the riders' choices. The American way is to educate people about the risks and let them make the decision. Encourage people to do the right thing. It *is* a stupid risk and people can be fool-hearty. The communist/socialist way is to assume that most people are too stupid to make good decisions and that the govt should do it for them. The answer is not in policing every single thing a person does in their personal lives. We give up small doses of our freedom every time we allow these types of laws to be made. AAA went too far in their comments. Driving a vehicle is *not* a priviledge bestowed upon us by virtue of the state's regulation of the Dept of Motor Vehicles. We earn the right to drive by passing a test, paying for the license and obeying laws.

PTCollins
Mar 14, 2007 | 10:42 AM

The statistics support the theory that seatbelts save lives. People should wear them and drivers should ensure everyone in the car wears them, as the driver is ultimately responsible regardless of the riders' choices. The American way is to educate people about the risks and let them make the decision. Encourage people to do the right thing. It *is* a stupid risk and people can be fool-hearty. The communist/socialist way is to assume that most people are too stupid to make good decisions and that the govt should do it for them. The answer is not in policing every single thing a person does in their personal lives. We give up small doses of our freedom every time we allow these types of laws to be made. AAA went too far in their comments. Driving a vehicle is *not* a privilege bestowed upon us by virtue of the state's regulation of the Dept of Motor Vehicles. We earn the right to drive by passing a test, paying for the license and obeying laws.

rosesayz read my blog
Mar 14, 2007 | 10:45 AM

I started a blog on this last night, but not sure what happened to it, but.....I believe they have bigger fish to fry......They want us to buckle up but yet they let motorcyclist ride without helmets.....That is just insane....Every time I see a motorcyclist without a helmet my stomach gets sick. I use my seatbelt and I make my children buckle up. When they leave the house my last words to them is I love you and buckle up....but to be pulled over for not wearing a seatbelt is just another way of control. There has to be accountability for ourselves somewhere. Society blames the government for everything that goes wrong..Ok......they are to blame for some things, but society has dropped the ball with accepting accountability for themselves.

When the hurricanes hit in 04 and 05, yes, it was tragic, water was scarce then and who’s fault is it?? The people blamed the government when we were told to make sure you have enough supplies to last you for 3 to 5 days until help can arrive...This was all warned BEFORE the hurricanes hit...but because people didn't prepare for it before hand, they need a scapegoat......If someone does not wear a seatbelt, then they have to accept accountability for themselves......Next law suit you will be hearing about is the police getting sued because they didn't pull someone over to put on a seatbelt........Just add this to the countless frivolous lawsuits.

It's time for people to accept responsibility for themselves.

Nya20
Mar 14, 2007 | 3:11 PM

It's time for people to accept responsibility for themselves...AMEN

Police are just missing there monthly quota so they need a new law so they can get it.

Leave the stupids alone that want to drive without there seatbelts and find out how is Killing all these people in orlando, find out who keeps robbing homes and stores.

Leave the Good taxs payers and non-seatbelters alone!

wicket6029 read my blog
Mar 15, 2007 | 2:14 PM

They need to focus on the other problems on the roadways that is making all the reasons to buckle up. Racing cars, drunks, drive by shootings, and road rage. You just never know what is driving around you. Take care of the problems first. Get the priorities in order !!!!

GrayWolfNOrlando read my blog view my photos
Mar 16, 2007 | 8:36 PM

My opinion it's all propaganda when it comes to seat belts and saving lives. When it's time for you to go, it's your time and seat belts won't help. I knew 2 people who always wore their belts and they didn't live when they were in seperate car accidents. I think that people under the age of 18 should wear seat belts, after that it's one's own decision. School buses should have seat belts but it's not required. Sounds hypocritical. It's a motor vehicle and we all know kids can't stay in their seats. Motor cycle users/riders should wear helmets, but they have the option not to if they are over 18 years of age. Again, sounds hypocritical. Motor cycalists don't have to have insurance. It's a motor vehicle and they want the same rights on the road just as a automobile. Again, it's hypocritical. I sometimes don't wear one, but it doesn't make a criminal. A driver should have a choice if he/she wants to wear a seat belt. Motor cycle users have a choice, automobile users should have a choice if they want to wear a seat belt or not. It's all propaganda by the federal government and the insurance companies.

GrayWolfNOrlando read my blog view my photos
Mar 17, 2007 | 5:29 AM

First, I would like to know why FOX keeps deleting my comments on this subject. Maybe because I'm using the word p.r.o.p.a.g.a.n.d.a.
But any way. I think it should be up to the individual if he/she wants to wear a seat belt, if you're over the age of 18. Motorcycle users have the choice of wearing a helmet. I think states that don't have a helmet laws are hypocritical at saying they are trying to save lives. I think it's bull by the government and the insurance companies trying to take some of our freedoms away. On most school buses through out the country, their are no seat belts because they say kids can get hurt by them, that it's better for them not to use them. It's a motor vehicle and seat belts are suppose to save lives. Seems to me a better chance of getting hurt. Seat belts don't save lives, I had 2 friends of mine involved in 2 seperate crashes die and they always wore their seat belts. I sometimes don't wear a seat belt, but it doesn't make me a criminal, it's my choice. That's why I have full coverage insurance, something a motorcycle user isn't required to have. Again, hypocritical. If you're over 18 it should be your choice. You're not hurting anyone else. My opinion, when it's your time to go seat belts will not help you.

masterofgtrs read my blog
Mar 18, 2007 | 7:58 PM

most time i wear my seat belt there are time i wont becaause i have a messed up rotator cup in my shoulder and wearing my belt is painfull but i have to drive . would they rather me not use my belt at these times or should i take a couple darvacetts to kill the pain and buckle up and drive. my kids are always buckled when in the car but its not always good for me. I agree with all that question the helmet law , being an ex 16 yr vetran volunteer firefighter?emt i seen many more cycleist die from head injury not wearing helmets then those dying in cars not wearing seat belts , not saying wearing one isnt a bad idea but it should be a choice.

PartyGirl19 read my blog view my photos
Mar 18, 2007 | 11:14 PM

Just one more reason for the croocked cops to give you tickets even if you were wearing the belt or not. You can fight it all you want, the crooked cops says that you were not wearing, then your busted even if you always wear one.

panasoffkee read my blog
Mar 19, 2007 | 1:02 AM

For being a news organization they sure do alot of deleting comments. Guess they don't believe in the first amendment. I've seen some of mine disappear as well. What's the matter? Can't handle the truth?

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




Steve_Gehlbach

Reporter for FOX 35 News

Member Since: 10/10/2006