MyFox
 

Stand4UrRights's Blog

by Stand4UrRights from The State of Florida

Last Post 74 days, 10 hours Ago


The Cyber Narcissist

By: Dr. Sam Vaknin

 

 

http://samvak.tripod.com/journal67.html

 

To the narcissist, the Internet is an alluring and irresistible combination of playground and hunting grounds, the gathering place of numerous potential Sources of Narcissistic Supply, a world where false identities are the norm and mind games the bon ton. And it is beyond the reach of the law, the pale of social norms, the strictures of civilized conduct.

The somatic finds cyber-relationships aplenty. The cerebral claims false accomplishments, fake skills, erudition and talents. Both, if minimally communicative, end up at the instantly gratifying epicenter of a cult of fans, followers, stalkers, erotomaniacs, denigrators, and plain nuts. The constant attention and attendant quasi-celebrity feed and sustain their grandiose fantasies and inflated self-image.

The Internet is an extension of the real-life Narcissistic Pathological Space but without its risks, injuries, and disappointments. In the virtual universe of the Web, the narcissist vanishes and reappears with ease, often adopting a myriad aliases and nicknames. He (or she) can thus fend off criticism, abuse, disagreement, and disapproval effectively and in real time – and, simultaneously, preserve the precarious balance of his infantile personality. Narcissists are, therefore, prone to Internet addiction.

The positive characteristics of the Net are largely lost on the narcissist. He is not keen on expanding his horizons, fostering true relationships, or getting in real contact with other people. The narcissist is forever the provincial because he filters everything through the narrow lens of his addiction. He measures others – and idealizes or devalues them – according to one criterion only: how useful they might be as Sources of Narcissistic Supply.

The Internet is an egalitarian medium where people are judged by the consistency and quality of their contributions rather than by the content or bombast of their claims. But the narcissist is driven to distracting discomfiture by a lack of clear and commonly accepted hierarchy (with himself at the pinnacle). He fervently and aggressively tries to impose the "natural order" – either by monopolizing the interaction or, if that fails, by becoming a major disruptive influence.

But the Internet may also be the closest many narcissists get to psychodynamic therapy. Because it is still largely text-based, the Web is populated by disembodied entities. By interacting with these intermittent, unpredictable, ultimately unknowable, ephemeral, and ethereal voices – the narcissist is compelled to project unto them his own experiences, fears, hopes, and prejudices.

Transference (and counter-transference) are quite common on the Net and the narcissist's defence mechanisms – notably projection and Projective Identification – are frequently aroused. The therapeutic process is set in motion by the – unbridled, uncensored, and brutally honest - reactions to the narcissist's repertory of antics, pretensions, delusions, and fantasies.

The narcissist – ever the intimidating bully – is not accustomed to such resistance. Initially, it may heighten and sharpen his paranoia and lead him to compensate by extending and deepening his grandiosity. Some narcissists withdraw altogether, reverting to the schizoid posture. Others become openly antisocial and seek to subvert, sabotage, and destroy the online sources of their frustration. A few retreat and confine themselves to the company of adoring sycophants and unquestioning groupies.

But a long exposure to the culture of the Net – irreverent, skeptical, and populist – usually exerts a beneficial effect even on the staunchest and most rigid narcissist. Far less convinced of his own superiority and infallibility, the online narcissist mellows and begins – hesitantly – to listen to others and to collaborate with them.

Ultimately, most narcissists - those who are not schizoid and shun social contact - tire of the virtual reality that is cyberspace. The typical narcissist needs "tangible" narcissistic supply. He craves attention from real, live, people, flesh and blood. He strives to see in their eyes their admiration and adulation, the awe and fear that he inspires, the approval and affirmation that he elicits.

There is no substitute to human contact, even for the narcissist. Many narcissists try to carry online relationships they nurtured into their logical extension and conclusion offline. Other burst upon the cyber scene intermittently, vanishing for long months, only to dive back in and reappear, reinvigorated. Reality beckons and few narcissists resist its siren call.

8. How dangerous is narcissism, inside or outside the web?

A. Very dangerous. Just read the list of diagnostic criteria for the Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD): the narcissist lacks empathy, is arrogant, exploits people, is envious, has a strong and unjustified sense of entitlement, and is obsessive and delusional. Many narcissists are also psychopaths. Pathological narcissism is often diagnosed with other mental health disorders (a phenomenon called "co-morbidity"). Narcissists are over-represented among criminals, gamblers, and people with reckless and inconsiderate behaviors.

Interview granted to Agencia Efe, Spain, April 2008

1. Does the Internet make a special amplification of narcissism or is just the reflection of reality? How, despite of the fact that many people is disturbed by the anonymous characters that you can adopt in the Internet, the exhibitionism is, maybe, more usual. I mean, in terms of narcissism? Can a person be addicted to the web because is own narcissism?

A. The narcissist likes to appear to be mysterious. It enhances his self-perceived sense of omnipotence, it renders him "unique" and "interesting". The right moniker (Internet alias or handle) imbues the narcissist with a sense of immunity and superiority and permits him to commit the most daring or heinous acts.

2. What kind of lacks or necessities there are behind this behaviour? What are we expecting when we search our name on Google? Can we construct our image with the pieces of us in the internet?

A. The Internet is the hi-tech equivalent of a giant mirror. Like the mythical Narcissus, it allows us to fall in love with our reflection every day anew. We gaze into the depths of the Internet to reassure ourselves of our continuity and very existence. It is our modern photo album; a repository of snippets of our lives; and our external memory.

In psychoanalytic terms, the Internet replaces some of our ego functions: it regulates our sense of self-worth; puts us in touch with reality and with others; and structures our interactions (via its much vaunted peer-pressure of the Netiquette and the existence of editors and moderators).

We crave attention and feedback: proof positive that we matter, that someone cares about us, that we are not mere atoms in a disjointed and anomic Universe. In this sense, the Internet substitutes for God and many social functions by reassuring us that we fit into a World that, though amorphous and protean, is sustaining, predictable, constant, and nurturing. The Internet replaces our parents as a source of nourishment, support, caring, discipline, and omniscience.

3. In the case of the blogs, what's the point in common in the idea of doing a private diary and be available for everybody?

A. I am not sure what you mean. Blogs are anything but private. They are explicitly meant for public consumption, thrive on public attention, and encourage interaction with the public (through the comments area). One can set one's blog or online journal to "private", though, as the hi-tech equivalent of a personal diary.

4. Internet, with their blogs, Facebook, Myspace or YouTube, has create the possibility of make yourself famous without promotion, just with the progressive diffusion of your material. Examples like the singers Mika and Lilly Allen or many bloggers, can it make a new way of realizing the "American dream" for the users of the Internet?

A. Being famous encompasses a few important functions: it endows us with power, provides us with a constant Source of Narcissistic Supply (admiration, adoration, approval, awe), and fulfils important Ego functions.

The Internet caters to our narcissistic traits and propensities and allows us to become "celebrities-by-replication". The image that the blogger or artist projects is hurled back at him, reflected by those exposed to his instant celebrity or fame. By generating multiple copies of himself and his work, he feels alive, his very existence is affirmed and he acquires a sensation of clear boundaries (where he ends and the world begins).

There is a set of narcissistic behaviors typical to the pursuit of celebrity. There is almost nothing that the Net celebrity refrains from doing, almost no borders that he hesitates to cross to achieve renown. To him (or, increasingly, her), there is no such thing as "bad publicity": what matters is to be in the public eye at any price.

Because narcissistic individuals equally enjoy all types of attention and like as much to be feared as to be loved, for instance – they don't mind if what is published about them is wrong ("as long as they spell my name correctly"). The celebrity blogger or artist experiences bad emotional stretches only when he lacks attention, or publicity.

It is then that some bloggers, artists, and Webmasters plot, contrive, plan, conspire, think, analyse, synthesise and do whatever it takes to regain the lost exposure in the public eye. The more they fail to secure the attention of the target group (preferably, the entire Internet community), the more daring, eccentric and outlandish they become. A firm decision to become known is transformed into resolute action and then to a panicky pattern of attention seeking behaviours.

It is important to understand that the blogger/artist/Webmaster are not really interested in publicity per se. They appear to be interested in becoming a celebrity, but, in reality, they are concerned with the REACTIONS to their newly-acquired fame: people watch them, notice them, talk about them, debate their actions – therefore they exist.

5. There are many new applications to feed human narcissism on the net: Googlefight, Egosurf.org, the blogs themselves... Could be used narcissism as a business?

A. Every good business is founded on the mass psychology of its clientele. In a narcissistic civilization, business is bound to adapt and become increasingly more narcissistic. The Internet started off as an information exchange. The surge of (mainly American) users transformed it in profound ways. User-generated "content" is a thin veneer beneath which lurks the seething and pathological narcissism of the masses. Narcissism is our main business organizing principle outside the Internet as well: cosmetics, fashion, health, publishing, show business, the media, and the financial industries all rest on firm narcissistic foundations. The management class itself is highly narcissistic!

6. Can be satisfied the true and pathologic narcissism just with the feed-back on the Internet or it needs, finally, to put in "real" his power of attraction.

A. What's not real about the Internet? This dichotomy between virtual and real is false. The Internet is as real as it gets and, for many of its users, it is the only reality and the only frame of reference. It is "reality" as we used to know it that is gradually vanishing and being replaced by "virtual" substitutes: print media are dying and giving way to blogs and online news aggregators; iTunes and Napster and BitTorrent and eMule are ruining the very physical music CD; there is more published on the Internet than is available in many brick and mortar libraries, and so on.

7. Could presence or non-presence in Internet create a new kind of social class?

A. Like every other social phenomenon, the Internet gave rise to a stratified society with hackers, crackers, nerds, geeks, Wikipedians, bloggers, etc. occupying various niches. Not using the Internet - a kind of Internet Luddism - may yet become a badge of honor. Internet addicts may become either outcasts or the new elite. Who knows? Everything digital is still in its formative years and still in flux.

 

As I have stated before - stand your ground against cyber bullies - remember that no one has to put up with any type of disrespect - no matter how old you are.  Make your stand against these bullies and stop them in their tracks!  I would recommend visiting this site and read the whole page in it's entirety!  Everyone has rights!

 

8 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 8
Page 1 of 1
WilliamHoward read my blog
Sep 15, 2008 | 10:52 PM

Interesting post indeed...I perused through it and was just wondering if the "Internet Narcissist" is STRICTLY male. When referred to, every entry states "He is", "He does", "It is him"....Have not women the capability or culpability of being an "Internet Narcissist"?

Ericjhach read my blog view my photos
Sep 16, 2008 | 7:18 AM

Only those who want to be bullied let themself be bullied.
To answer your question William, yes women can be the same and sometimes worse.

Stand4UrRights read my blog
Sep 16, 2008 | 12:13 PM

William - I thought about the same thing as I read this when I came across this article quite some time ago. Even though the author has made some really excellent points - I do believe that it should not have related all just to the he's of it all. But the author's book is an excellent read. And with my experience of trolls that I have come across on the net and in real life, women are the worse kine. The problem with women is that the majority of them carry grudges and read more into something that is not there and make a big deal about it. Even if they are wrong they will go through great lengths to prove they are right no matter who they walk on. Why a woman can not admit she is wrong and just move on is beyond me. I am ashamed to admit this as I am a much older woman getting ready to be a grandmother. And it angers me to see younger and older women who know better acting the fools like this. Women could learn by examples that the majority of men set. I have seen men remain friends longer because men can argue - call each other names one minute which at times involves physical altercations at times - and the next minute they shake hands and the incident is clearly forgotten never to be brought up again. Women just can not do that. So yes I agree with Eric that women are more vindictive - aggressive - and very manipulative all at the same time while saying - What who me - Would I do such a thing?

I have come across four users so far that claims to be a man but they way they write - complain - degrade others - and the way they can not let things go - makes me wonder i

Stand4UrRights read my blog
Sep 16, 2008 | 12:15 PM

I have come across four users so far that claims to be a man but they way they write - complain - degrade others - and the way they can not let things go - makes me wonder if these are women in disguise. The users are on my other topics - Zipit - DaytonaFrank - MrAsphalt - the other has not commented on my page yet however after reading through another topic that I referenced this to - it is clear to see this Abunai person fits right in as an excellent example as well. And Eric is correct in his statement and if more individuals disallowed others to bully them - then eventually they will behave or just move on. Now back to work I go - lunch break is over for me - bummer!

WilliamHoward read my blog
Sep 16, 2008 | 5:20 PM

Stand4UrRights....Keep standing for your rights and I sincerely appreciate you standing for mine in regards to a previous post that, of course, was deleted by FOX. The general consensus "dictated" that I went too far...I'll concede that it was extreme, yet I stand by the satirical truth of the characterization depicted in the post....To see how this entire ordeal camt to fruition....just visit ZipitHippy's Blog entitled Whats a liberal? and please bear in mind that my interaction with ANYONE on this site is Just For Laughs....because.....Laughter is good medicine.

Stand4UrRights read my blog
Sep 16, 2008 | 6:44 PM

Thanks for referring me to read that topic. I think Deb is in denial and wants you so badly she's starting to drool. LOL! Seeing what Deb wrote there prompted me to visit her page. Apparently she is a very racial individual with no brains and is also a perfect example of an internet troll and bully herself. I doubt she graduated the 10th grade or if she did - the way she verbalizes her topics shows she did not get very far in school. I can see how well you write and then compared with hers - well there is no comparison. Anyone with an education can read the topic on "SUTHERN" WOMEN as she puts it and can clearly see why this woman is trolling on the net. Even many of the so called redneck - southern women I have come across act more lady like than she does. The name you gave her is actually giving her too much credit.

I was sad to see your other post was apparently deleted. But at least not before the TRUTH was shared with many. It is so sad to see how the bullies can dish it out but are not big enough to take it right back. I wonder how long it took them to complain before Fox just gave up and deleted it. Great job though. I really enjoy the way you write your topics and share your stories. Heck you can put my name through the ringer and I would laugh right along with you. You are so right when you keep stating that laughter is the best medicine. If we can not laugh at ourselves then who can we laugh at?

TAllen read my blog view my photos
Sep 17, 2008 | 11:48 AM

Me thinks tho doth protest to loudly.

Stand4UrRights read my blog
Sep 17, 2008 | 12:53 PM

I am glad to be able to make you think. That is considered good exercise.

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




Stand4UrRights

Truly annoyed - well I need to update this as I have found some really good people to debate with on this site - so to correct myself - it's not so annoying after all. :)

Member Since: 8/26/2008