MyFox
 

Sageman's Blog

by Sageman from Orlando

Last Post 113 days, 23 hours Ago


I'm sure most everyone who will read this knows of the recent tragedy to befall Tibet. So I beg to ask this question, "Can we in America do anything to influence the second most powerful nation in the world to free Tibet? Can we influence a nation with out going the route of Iraq?"

I think that people in America our ignorant of the true power they hold. We are all consumers and as such that gives us an enormous amount of power. Especially if you consider that China Exports almost as much to us in America as it does the rest of the world.

Is the only might America truly has at the end of the sword?

Do you think boycotting Chinese products would influence China along the path of freeing Tibet?
56 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 56
Page 1 of 2
1
Last
rottweiler7575 read my blog view my photos
Mar 19, 2008 | 11:54 PM

Lets take care of AMERICA first, screw TIBET

ThinkTanked read my blog view my photos
Mar 20, 2008 | 10:22 AM

Most Americans should be boycotting China by now already.

Sageman read my blog
Mar 20, 2008 | 11:39 PM

Screw Tibet? That's a little harsh. I think that as Americans we should promote freedom in all aspects.

Plus, by boycotting Chinese products you would see a boost in the sales of American made products as well. This would benefit not only the Tibetans but America as well in the long run.

RandyLoo read my blog view my photos
Mar 20, 2008 | 11:58 PM

Boycott any and all corporate sponsors of the Olympics..that is for a start.

zbert read my blog
Mar 21, 2008 | 6:05 PM

It's not our business. That would be like China telling us to free one of our states.

Sageman read my blog
Mar 22, 2008 | 2:47 AM

Comparing America to China is like comparing apples to oranges. China has a history of horrific human rights violations. They use fear to keep people from demonstrating and when they do they crack down on protesters harshly. Some of the people who protested in Tienanmen Square still sit in prison today. The fact is that if a country wont allow the natural freedoms to their citizens, The pursuit of happiness, freedom of speech etc... then those that have opened their eyes have an obligation to help.

We in America take our freedom and civil rights for granted. If we were to live in a country like China or North Korea for just a year I guarantee you would come home with a different perspective.

Something as simple as a boycott of Chinese products would have a huge impact economically on China, thus putting pressure on politically on them.

Though logically you wont see a change in china for a long while regarding human rights or civil rights, you might see them at least autonomy to them.

zbert read my blog
Mar 22, 2008 | 5:48 AM

The US has a history of Human rights violations that in some ways still continues. We are willingly giving up the rights the Founders fought and died for, and we are telling other countries about Human Rights?
Boycots have never worked.
China also has HongKong, which is one of the most free economies in the world. They are going through a period of transition and becomming a free society. The regime is not going to give up control easily. If we get involved, they are going to fight harder for control.

zbert read my blog
Mar 22, 2008 | 6:34 AM

North Korea and China are two completely different societies. China is a relatively open society with open trade and tourism. Outside infuences are everywhere, like McDonalds and other Western companies. One of their largest industries is torism.
There has been a three way struggle for Tibet for centuries between India, China and Tibet. All feel they have a legitimate claim.

zbert read my blog
Mar 22, 2008 | 7:35 AM

Sorry, I meant to say India laid claim to a part of Tibet.

Sageman read my blog
Mar 22, 2008 | 12:37 PM

We do have a history of human rights violations I wouldn't disagree with you there. Yet just because of our past we are supposed to turn a blind eye to things happening in the present?

North Korea and China are different but neither is a place that any American would want to live in. In both country's if you were to write a blog like I have here it would get a you prison term. Sometimes the biggest human rights violation is living in a society where you are never truly free.

zbert read my blog
Mar 22, 2008 | 2:52 PM

We are supposed to honor the sovereignty of other countries. The Chinese are fighting against a group that wants to secede from China. Thath group wants to form a thecracy, not a free society. Tibet is also totally dependent on China for food and other supplies. They don't have enough fertile soil to feed themselves, and they don't want to be productive.

zbert read my blog
Mar 22, 2008 | 2:58 PM

Most Americans would be uncomfortabble living in Europe, so that doesn't say much.
Hong Kong is a very free and capitalisic region that is having a profound effect on the rest of the country. China doesn't want to change it because it is so profitable.
China has thousends of US visitors every year. They have a lot of US businesses in Peking.
North Korea is a closed society.

Sageman read my blog
Mar 22, 2008 | 10:52 PM

Actually I know several people who have lived in Europe with no problem at all.

Hong Kong was given limited autonomy because of certain guarantees given during the hand over of Hong Kong to China from the United Kingdom. It has several laws that are applicable to only Hong Kong, but no one is disillusioned about the fact that this is going to change in the future. The main reason for the changes are economic as such as long as the economy booms they will continue to honor the limited autonomy to Hong Kong.

For a real history of Tibet you might want to check up how China annexed Tibet in 1959. Up till then China had claimed that Tibet was part of China's sovereignty. A claim that was challenged by the United Kingdom. Both India and China had a history of invading Tibet and both countries laid claim to the country. Tibet denied the claims at every stage.

Whats troubling is that Tibet invaded a country that was ruled by a Theocracy which was ruled by the Dalai Lama, a Buddhist. Buddhism is a pacifistic religion, they don't believe in violence except in defense of their own lives or another.

China invaded and occupied them due to the perceived threat from India at the time. Since that time they have imprisoned anyone who protested the occupation of Tibet. To this day many countries still view Tibet as an occupied nation.

Funny people would argue sovereignty when the invasion of Tibet was one of the ultimate affronts to sovereignty in the 20th century.

J_Darrowin read my blog view my photos
Mar 23, 2008 | 9:11 AM

First of all, thanks Sageman, for posting this. I didn't think anyone would do it. Most people don't seem interested in world news.

I'm afraid that nothing will really be done about Tibet. The world shrugged when the monks started that democratic uprising in Burma (in the most twisted irony, nations asked China to help them in their efforts to surpress the brutal crackdown by the government against the protesters. I guess they forgot about Tiananmen Square). The world will shrug again, and move on.

As much as I would love to participate in a boycott against Chinese goods, I don't think it'll work. Just about everything many of us own was made in China. Just visit your local dept. store and look at the labels. China has of of the most dominant export markets in the world, thanks to their near slave labor costs and unfair trading practices.

In short, as much as I'd like to see something done, I have no ideas what could be done.

zbert read my blog
Mar 23, 2008 | 9:25 AM

I know some Americans who live in Europe too, but I said most, not some or several.

Tibet has always been considered a part of China. There have been different levels of control. but it was always part of China.

Most Tibetians are nomads. During the winter months they go into other parts of China. They get much of their staples from China.

Much of China is Buddhist. Tibet has a form of Buddhism, not the original.

zbert read my blog
Mar 23, 2008 | 9:33 AM

Many people go to Hong Kong to work or visit. When they go home they are telling others about it. The Chinese are starting to demand freedom. There are 4 autonomous regions of China. These regions govern themselves. Tibet is one of those regions, and they are talking of seceding. That is the reason the Chinese army is there.

Sageman read my blog
Mar 23, 2008 | 2:11 PM

Every political analyst with any idea of the inner working of the communist party in China will tell you, freedom is a long way off. Possibly as long as a 100 years or more, unless some exterior influences come into play to push a change quicker. Thats based on every political journal I've read about China written by either conservative or liberal.

Also I have talked with some missionaries who spent several year's in China. They told me several horrific stories of Chinese Christians being imprisoned for the faith because even though they had no intention of pushing towards a revolution or implementing any type of political change, they had the audacity to practice a faith that was frowned on by the Communist Party.

The freedom you talk about is pretty much one that's spoken of with a golden tongue. People need to wisen up and stop listening to those people who are afraid that if a boycott movement did start in America they might lose a free source of cheap/slave labor.

zbert read my blog
Mar 23, 2008 | 2:23 PM

And those same analysts said the Soviet Union would never fall.
The Communist Party has already given up a lot of power. The people have had a taste of freedom. Capitalism has taken root and is thriving. Hong Kong has already infected the country with the Free Market and the government officials wi not be able to control it.
Those "analysts" want to maintain fear to control the US populaton.

Sageman read my blog
Mar 23, 2008 | 4:58 PM

Analysts actually predicted the fall of the Soviet Union in the late 1970's and these predictions were one of the things that influenced Reagan's decision to pump up our military. Because he knew if he collapsed the economy in the U.S.S.R. then social reform would soon be to follow.

Comparing U.S.S.R and China are far off do the vast cultural differences between the two. Thats the thing a lot of people miss when looking at China. You can't compare them to the standards we place on countries influenced by western social strata.

The revolution in China was one that took almost a 100 years to come into fruition the first time. That's because in many cases the older generation are hardcore communists and their children have deep respect for them. Thus the majority will continue to honor their parents beliefs. Why do you think the communist party, in the 50's and 60's, purged the country of historians and artists? Because of the importance the Chinese people place on the ancestors!

Thus the country will not fall for a long time but may be convinced to change it's stance on certain regions with out losing face.

zbert read my blog
Mar 23, 2008 | 5:41 PM

When the Soviet Union collapsed, everybody was surprised. Nobody expected it.
The collapse was caused by outside influences. The western countries started openly trading and visiting Russia. They had access to people from other areas.
Poland's Solidarity Union was formed in 1980. Less than 10 years later, the Berlin Wall came down.

zbert read my blog
Mar 23, 2008 | 5:49 PM

Western countries were trading with China for centuries peacefully.

Again, we have no right to tell another country what kind of government they should have. The best thing to do is show them by example, and we're doing a really bad job of it right now.

Sageman read my blog
Mar 23, 2008 | 6:22 PM

Uhm if by peacefully you are referring to the Opium Wars then sure it was peaceful alright.

Your facts are convoluted to say the least. Everyone suspected that the U.S.S.R. would collapse they were just not expecting at the exact moment it happened. Many political analysts had written on what would collapse the U.S.S.R., one theory was an economic collapse. The only reason social changes came to the U.S.S.R. was the collapse of their economy. Something Reagan was well aware of due to conferring with experts on the Soviet Union during his tenure in office as president.

Poland's solidarity movement did nothing but mobilize the Kremlin to crack down on political activists with in the Russian Borders.

zbert read my blog
Mar 23, 2008 | 6:54 PM

Do you know what the Opium Wars were all about or how long?

The "experts" in the USSR kept predicting the fall of the US for the same reasons.
Predicting something will happen sometime in the future is not really predicting.
If the people of the USSR didn't struggle for freedom, it wouldn't have happened. Solidarity was a big part of the process.

Sageman read my blog
Mar 23, 2008 | 11:10 PM

It was a collapse... There wasn't a whole lot of struggling. The country had leaders in office who saw that the system was not working and disbanded the government.

Were you refering to the first Opium War that was between 1834 and 1843 or the Second Opium War that was between 1856 and 1860? They were started because China saw the horrific impact the opium trade was having on their citizens. I'm not going to go into specifics because it detracts from the message. The Chinese still hold resentment over the Opium War's to this day...

And yes predicting something really is predicting.... Predicting = Predicting...

zbert read my blog
Mar 24, 2008 | 11:14 AM

I can predict it's going to rain. Eventually I will be right. If you call that a prediction, then I'm pretty good at it.

Other than the Opium Wars which were between China and England for a total of 7 years, trade has been peaceful. No other countries have had a problem.

zbert read my blog
Mar 24, 2008 | 11:23 AM

I'm sure the people of Poland and the other Eastern Europe countries will be relieved that the tanks and troops in their streets weren't a real threat. Lech Walensa, who spent 10 years in prison for forming Solidarity, will be happy to know it was just a vacation for him. They thought he needed a rest.

They trained you well, neocon. Keep beieving what they tell you. If you think for yourself, you might see they have been lying to you.

zbert read my blog
Mar 24, 2008 | 11:26 AM

The Opium Wars are not a distraction because they were another time a European country tried to tell China what to do.

Somthinsup read my blog
Mar 24, 2008 | 4:27 PM

Hey I've got an idea......Let's stick our noses into one more countries business and then we can blame Bush for that mess too!

Give it a rest....let China handle it's own business. We've already got enough on our plate without having to piss off China.

zbert read my blog
Mar 24, 2008 | 5:18 PM

"let China handle it's own business. We've already got enough on our plate without having to piss off China."

Thank you.

That is especially true with China that can actually hurt us.

Abunai read my blog view my photos
Mar 24, 2008 | 7:52 PM

Oh PLEASE!!! Should we boycott Chinese products for Tibet? Yet another agenda item hidden in world events.

Let me rephrase that: Should we use the Chinese and Tibet issue as an excuse to boycott Walmart and others that are bringing in cheap goods? Should we support Tibet by buying Union made products here in America?

If a boycott from America even had an effect, it would just end up starving and hurting the "little people" in China. You are trying to associate capitalism in America with Communism in China!

Page 1 of 2
1
Last


Write your comment below:




Sageman

I have been an actor, writer, and journalist, among other things. Currently I am getting ready to go back to school. I think that news, as clichè as it sounds, is one day away from being history. I enjoy reading, writing, running, biking and swimming. Ironically I hate the Triathlon. Yet I believe exercise is the key to a happy life! Politically I'm a Moderate Democrat and I listen to anyone's views, the only thing that really irks me is people who insult others for having different views. Which often makes me insult them in turn. I guess that makes me a Hypocrite... At least I won't be lonely.

Member Since: 3/19/2008