MyFox
 

Meb452m's Blog

by Meb452m from Orlando

Last Post 4 days Ago


D.C.'s gun-ban, banned. The recent Supreme Court ruling threw out the gun control law fosteres by those in Washington D.C.  It is a victory and once again the ordinary law-abiding man or woman can legally protect themselves as guarenteed by the Second Amendment in the Constitution, right ? That's right, but did the justices did a little two-step shuffel as well ? In that ruling, they struck down D.C.'s ban and then stated that the Second Amendment Right to bear arms is not ABSOLUTE. I fully understand what that word means , it means your rights, as a law-abiding citizen, by this ruling are conditional.  It is my belief  this wording opens the door and allows further litigation and dissent. , Suppossedly we have a system of checks and balances, has anything been " checked " ? Has  " balance " been restored ?  Does this ruling state " conditions " ?  Does this ruling state who has the specific authority to set  " conditions " and under what circumstances ?

I understand the need for " martial law " , that authority, and those conditions. I understand the "need " to deny convicted felons the right to bear arms. I understand the " need " to deny those that are mentally ill the right of possession.

But what about those that abide by the law ? Will this word " absolute " , it 's use in this case, and some unfinished bussiness open the door and leave MORE VICTIMS ?

Your thoughts, your comments, do you care ?
9 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 9
Page 1 of 1
Gammies61 read my blog view my photos
Jul 1, 2008 | 11:21 AM

There was a ban on hand guns. Did they have rifles and shotguns? Were they also banned? I don't like the word "absolute". Sounds like you may be right.

DeborahLakeHelen read my blog view my photos
Jul 1, 2008 | 9:44 PM

Well, dee-da-dee! One of the most dangerous, crime-ridden places in the country FINALLY came to their senses! Hallelujah!

Meb452m read my blog
Jul 1, 2008 | 9:49 PM

Hey Deborah ! Striking down DC's ban was good, a citizen can defend himself again with deadly force if neccessary, but the wording means it isn't over yet.

Meb452m read my blog
Jul 1, 2008 | 9:53 PM

Hey Gammies ! Do you have those " special " glasses that allow you to read between the lines ? If so it sounds like we may share a common prescription ! LOL !!!!!

LQQKING read my blog view my photos
Jul 2, 2008 | 1:20 AM

Gam 61

The DC Bann made any handgun illegal to posess under any circumstances rifes and shotguns could not leave your home and inside the home had to be broken down or unloaded and trigger locked

LQQKING read my blog view my photos
Jul 2, 2008 | 1:24 AM

--CONTINUED--

You know after thinking about it for a few minutes I have to say that we are lucky here in Florida..........We were one of the first if not the first state to pass concealed carry

No licensing, no registration, storage in your auto while at work. Seem our Politicians get this one right every chance they get

Gammies61 read my blog view my photos
Jul 2, 2008 | 8:51 AM

LOL Meb, maybe we do? :)

Looking, if you can't take your shotgun or rifle out of the house, how would it be possible for anyone to go hunting? Stupid laws!

Our Politicians probably had to drive through Orange County a few times. LOL

DeborahLakeHelen read my blog view my photos
Jul 2, 2008 | 7:46 PM

Meb, THAT figures! If the libitards have it their way, it'll drag on forever, I reckon!

rottweiler7575 read my blog view my photos
Jul 6, 2008 | 4:47 PM

They will allow you to own a gun, but make it illegal to FIRE IT...They should all have there butt's kicked...

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




Meb452m

I've been a resident of Orlando and Orange Co. since 1960.

Member Since: 4/13/2007