FloydFreak's Blog

There are lots of hearings that should be held. Both sides of the aisle, all parties testifying under Oath.

Yeah, that's gonna happen. The GOP has set a track record of avoiding 'under Oath' for all they are worth. Why would the Dems be any different?

All this posturing right before an election. You'd think these people knew their job was secure w/the way they are all acting.

MoonOwl

??? Dodd & Frank should testify under oath. Does that help?

Who testifies under Oath? heck even Bush & Cheney had to be attached at the hip and NOT under oath to testify before the 911 Commission. Talk about acting like there is something to hide.

Has Karl Rove testified under Oath? Nope. He won't even show up.

I have an idea. Let's get every single member of our government to testify under Oath about everything. Let's find out who is being blackmailed and for what. All of them. If they have nothing to fear, what's the problem?

No exceptions and no excuses about 'national security' either.

Put them all on the stand and then throw them all out of office and move forward w/a fresh start and with people who embrace our founding documents.

Do you realize if S1959 (HR1955) passes, my above statement could make me a possible homegrown terrorist? Can we get back to true American values and get these sold-out, profiting, jerks out of there? Soon?

MoonOwl

"Do you realize if S1959 (HR1955) passes, my above statement could make me a possible homegrown terrorist? Can we get back to true American values and get these sold-out, profiting, jerks out of there? Soon?"

You really don't want to go there do you? I'm prepared to show you far worse offenses of personal liberty perpetrated by Democrats.

Do I really want to go there? Worse offenses by Dems?

Both sides are corrupt. How many times can I say it? The GOP sucks. So do the Dems. Period.

Arguing about who did what isn't going to get us anywhere but spinning our wheels over and over. That is what all of them want.

What kind of job did Dodd & Frank do? Apparently not a good one. Gee, stand in line. BOTH sides of the stinking, corrupted, fear-mongering aisle.

I'll say one pleasant thing about Barney Frank. At least he is out and proud. He obviously isn't being blackmailed about his sexuality. Or, maybe he is - who knows in this corrupted cesspool we have for a government.

How 'bout this. Can you admit that the GOP is as sold out as the Dems? Can you step back from a party and see the corruption within the whole system?

You can do it if you try.

Moo,

I always have said that there's enough blame to be spread around but... When you and YD try to pin ALL blame on Bush and make false claims that there's NO oversight, that's when I take a counter point.

And what does Barney Frank's sexuality have to do with anything? It seems that liberals are quick to point out sexual orientation when it suits them. It's ok for them to bash Larry Craig but not Barney Frank? I really don't care if Craig tapped at or didn't or who he's tapping or why or if he admits anything or not for that matter. Little hypocritical for liberals to do it don't you think?

BTW, nice distraction from the culpability of Frank And Dodd! Didn't work though.*wink*

Gee, was Larry Craig out of the closet?

My only point about Franks sexuality is that he is out. He doesn't puff himself up as a 'moral and devote' politician while at the same time meeting men in public restrooms. A politician that is 'in the closet' is subject to blackmail. Period.

It isn't a distraction, it's a fact. Politicians who lie open themselves up to blackmail. Not a great thing for the supposed 'leaders' of our nation.

WWII was an actual war. If I'm not mistaken, Congress hasn't even declared 'War' in Iraq or Afghanistan. Why declare war and open the monetary benefits that come w/the declaration for our Troops when they don't have to and can get by on the cheap in this "Self-Financing War".

If you haven't read HR 1955, perhaps you should. See for yourself how loose the wording of it is. That can't be by accident coming from a bunch of 'lawyers'. If you aren't worried, you should be.

As for Bush being culpable for the errors since he's been in office, imho, he is. This administration certainly hasn't stood up and said "Wait a minute, that ain't right". He hasn't even added any signing statements to help our Troops. Bush sucks, so do the rest.

As you say, there is enough blame to go around. That's almost an admission the GOP sucks too.

MoonOwl

"A politician that is 'in the closet' is subject to blackmail. Period."

There goes any future excuses you might have for Bill and his Magic Cigar traveling road show of lies.

I don't care if Craig was in a closet of a shoebox! I don't understand what you had to bring up Barney Frank's orientation or morality for? The point I was making was, he's in charge of the Financial Services Committee! You can't blame Bush for Frank not doing his job! Or Chris Dodd!

Not a declared war? What's that got to do with censoring? Look it up, there are far fewer "Formal declarations of war" as compared to "Military engagements authorized by Congress"! Afghanistan an Iraq fall into the latter. So did Vietnam where military censors were still employed. Your point is what again?